Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
MsLucy

Cold sores & alzheimers?

Recommended Posts

MsLucy

While watching the 6:00 local news tonight, I was surprised to learn that researchers had discovered a direct correlation between the incidence of Alzheimers and cold sores. Apparently, the nerves affected by oral herpes are related in some way to the part of the brain affected by Alzheimers, and those who suffer cold sores also stand a better chance of developing Alzheimers. Well, there's some cheerful news for you. The double whammy.

On the other hand, the announcer also went on to say that they're busy as little bees trying to find a vaccine for HSV1, not to prevent cold sores, but to lessen the odds of developing Alzheimers. I'm okay with that. If they develop a vaccine for a relatively minor disease in an attempt to prevent a truly devastating one, that's like killing two birds with one stone, right? Works for me. At least now they've got a little extra motivation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
curecomingverysoon

Anything that will bring a vaccine for HSV is great thing. Where there's a vaccine for HSV 1 or 2, the vaccine for the second will follow.

I think that this is JUST the kick in the pants that researchers/donaters/pharmas/doctors/whatever need. Hopefully we can get the Alzheimer's charity folks onside to start pushing for a cure now as well. And the fact that our current antivirals will help them as well until that cure/vaccine is found is just an added boon. So really, I think this is a win-win for all involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trigger

oh.. im so glad that i found this thread.. :)

By the way, does the vaccuine still works for people that has already contracted the HSV type 1 virus? Or can the vaccuine helps to prevent further OBs only and the Alzheimers virus?

I cant wait for the vaccuine to come out soon!... but i think they sure will take a long time to develop this vaccuine out :evil:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GntiNh

Yes I knew about the connection :( , but as you say it might help bring an end to hs, so it's not all bad news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ntdc
While watching the 6:00 local news tonight, I was surprised to learn that researchers had discovered a direct correlation between the incidence of Alzheimers and cold sores. Apparently, the nerves affected by oral herpes are related in some way to the part of the brain affected by Alzheimers, and those who suffer cold sores also stand a better chance of developing Alzheimers. Well, there's some cheerful news for you. The double whammy.

On the other hand, the announcer also went on to say that they're busy as little bees trying to find a vaccine for HSV1, not to prevent cold sores, but to lessen the odds of developing Alzheimers. I'm okay with that. If they develop a vaccine for a relatively minor disease in an attempt to prevent a truly devastating one, that's like killing two birds with one stone, right? Works for me. At least now they've got a little extra motivation.

This has been suspected since the 1970s though there is still no conclusive evidence as to what role it plays. What they have found amounts to this...

Some people have a certain genetic predisposition to Alzheimer's disease. Amongst people carrying that genetic variation HSV-1 will increase the risk of developing the disease. However those with HSV-1 without the predisposition don't have a strong correlation between HSV-1 and Alzheimer's disease. Additionally those with the genetic predisposition and without HSV-1 can and do often develop Alzheimer's disease. As far as they know all it does is raise your risk, if you are already at risk. Recently scientists have found HSV-1 DNA in the plaque which builds up in the brains of Alzhimer's disease patients. This is not a smoking gun but it renewed interest in finding out what, if any, role HSV-1 plays in the disease.

A bit off topic but I want to point out sometihng. If an HSV-1 vaccine is ever avilable drug companies will no doubt use this connection to try to push it as an anti-alzheimer's vaccine, just as gardasil is pushed as preventing cervical cancer in women. This is a kind of marketing ploy and IMO is quite dangerous. In the case of gardasil there is simply no evidence that it prevents cancer. It prevents HPV which can lead to cervical cancer, this is well known. What is not known is whether the vaccine given to a girl in childhood will provide lifelong protection. What I believe is a possible unintended side effect is that women will be less vigliant about getting routine cancer screenings as they feel they are "protected" when in fact they may not be.

These kind of long term studies are difficult if not impossible to carry out. Consider to test if such a vaccine could actually prevent or reduce the risk Alzheimer's enough participants would actually have to be followed from childhood until they are old enough to develop the disease (your risk is basically nothing until you are past 70).

The odds are that by the time such a study could be conducted (if at all) there would already be a drug developed to treat or cure the condition of Alzhiemer's.

I hope an effective cure and/or vaccine for HSV-1/2 is eventually found but I don't think they should lie to get people to take it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ginnyp

I get somewhat irritated because I am 34 years old and considered TOO OLD to get the gardisil vaccine, yet I do not have the hpv strains that it prevents. So it could still help me. However, gardisil does NOT protect against all the hpv strains, thus cannot protect completely against getting cervical cancer, so the thought of people not getting screened is scary. I recently found out I have hpv 35. I hope when people get the gardisil vaccine that they are explained to that it only can prevent 4 types of hpv, and there are 40 sexually transmitted types out there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ntdc
I get somewhat irritated because I am 34 years old and considered TOO OLD to get the gardisil vaccine, yet I do not have the hpv strains that it prevents. So it could still help me. However, gardisil does NOT protect against all the hpv strains, thus cannot protect completely against getting cervical cancer, so the thought of people not getting screened is scary. I recently found out I have hpv 35. I hope when people get the gardisil vaccine that they are explained to that it only can prevent 4 types of hpv, and there are 40 sexually transmitted types out there!

The researchers are working on another vaccine now to cover more strains

they're are many types of HPV over time they hope to roll out

vaccines against most of them. In 2007 the people running the mens trial for gardasil told me the 2nd vaccine is in the works and they hope to have it to early trials in a few years.

Remember no one knows if the vaccine can deliver life-long protection they only know it offers protection for 3yrs all women should continue regular screenings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,741
    • Total Posts
      470,272
  • Posts

    • BioHacker
      Meds and condoms is really all you need. Statistically, HSV2 is so widespread because 80-90% of  people who have it are unaware that they have it, and so they don't take all recommended precautions (including using condoms). Oddly enough, if you were to replace your HSV2+ girlfriend (aware of HSV status, using condoms, using suppressive meds) with the average American woman (unaware of HSV status, but 25% risk, which is average - and using condoms at all times, since presumably you could insist on it), you would actually NOT reduce your risk of HSV2. The statistical risk would be approximately the same for both theoretical girlfriends (about 0.7% per year assuming sex 2x per week). That is a bit simplistic, because maybe you could decide to date only women who are verified virgins (essentially no risk), or maybe "below average risk" in some way (younger than average, fewer prior partners than average, etc.), or you could have all prospective girlfriends IgG blood tested for HSV as a condition to dating them (or having sex with them), which would reduce the risk significantly (especially if you confirmed the paperwork), but not completely (since antibodies take some time to develop). At some point, beyond-standard precautions become inconvenient and not worth the hassle (or risk of being perceived as paranoid). The risk isn't zero, and probably would never be zero, short of taking extreme measures. Efforts to reduce risk beyond standard practices, which already reduce risk to relatively low levels, are naturally subject to the law of diminishing returns. Accepting some level of risk is (unfortunately) part of the deal in most reasonable endeavors. Also, there is statistically a greater likelihood of two people passing HPV between them one way or the other, than HSV2 (assuming all recommended precautions are being taken). Of course, you could get the HPV vaccine (everyone should!). But the vaccine only covers 10-15% of the types of HPV that are out there. And tests for HPV are imperfect, and generally not available for males. And HPV (some types) can cause cancer (cervical, penile, and throat - maybe others). So, keep that in mind as well. And then, of course, there are all the other risks . . . Best not to be paranoid though . . .
    • WilsoInAus
      That’s correct. HIV is a distinct virus. No virus morphs into another one.
    • WilsoInAus
      Hey @thebrightsidegirl I hope you’re going ok, I’ve read your posts and will see if I can draw some threads. I see that you have genital HSV-1 and your partner has oral HSV-1. I’m not sure if he has tested but given it’s somcommon there’s no reason to disbelieve that’s what he has. This is the best concirdant scenario you can hope for in a sexual relationship. You both already have the virus and your immune systems are established and your experience with herpes is your own. You cannot induce an outbreak in each other by virtue your own HSV-1 and transmission to a new location on your partner is too small to worry about. If HSV-2 is present, then it needs to be brought to the relationship. It’s not at all likely you have it given you were infected genitally with HSV-1.  I suggest these symptoms are very unlikely to be related to herpes at all. If they are, then it’s far more likely to be a recurrent outbreak issue with your HSV-1 as opposed to an initial infection with HSV-2. 
    • hopeing
      Ozone is basically toxic to humans at high levels. Its probably as likely to kill your cells as the virus. Add to that the virus is not in the blood and I'd say this 'treatment' is probably totally ineffective and if it does include high levels of real ozone likely dangerous. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_therapy
    • thebrightsidegirl
      Hey Wilson , do you kids answering this , i was kind of worried too ? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.