Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
Bronkus

Negative for HSV 1 and HSV 2, Positive for IGM

Recommended Posts

Bronkus

Hello everyone,

I had a blood test that tested negative for HSV 1 and HSV 2 and I tested positive for IGM. My doctor told me that I must have been exposed within the last 4-12 weeks. He also said that the IGM indicates that I would definitely eventually within a few months have HSV 1 or HSV 2. This didn't really sound right because I read somewhere that 9/10 people have the antibodies in them so can someone clarify this? Could it have been before 4-12 weeks, could IGM evolve into HSV 1 or HSV 2? Please someone help I am really worried. Thank You.

Bronkus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
motorcyclemaintainance

Hello,

The IGM test is allegedly meaningless:

http://www.medhelp.org/forums/STD/messages/2893.html

"False positive results are extremely common--probably not due to cross reaction with some other infection, just related to the biology and chemistry of the IgM molecule."

My biology isn't too hot, but as I understand it, if you have contracted HSV it will show up in an IGG test within a few months, and that would be your definitive indicator. I believe the IGM could indicate a recent infection, but since the IGM is apparently unreliable...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mr_Smith

Bronkus;

Get a new Doctor, and have your current Doctor pay for the worthless IgM test.

IgM antibodies do not 'evolve' into IgG, they are two different classes of antibodies. Think of IgM as a general purpose antibody which will show up for several different virues. The IgG antibody will only show up for the Herpes virus.

A positive IgM test result could indicate a recent infection, however, studies have shown that IgM antibodies also show up in about 34% of recurring outbreaks. And, it's very possible to be IgM positive and be negative for Herpes. Bottom line; an IgM test result is unreliable for the diagnosis of Herpes.

Regards

Mr Smith

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
new09

You should ask for an HSV Type Specific test IGG NOT IGM. I do know that a lot of the anonymous online labs (they send you to a lab to get tested) explain which test they offer.

Having an IGG test is useless!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Noober

Mr Smith,

I think you are wrong (although I could be the one mistaken and if so, I apologize).

It is my understanding the IGM tests will show a positive sooner than the old IGG tests. It takes awhile for you to develop the IGG antibodies, whereas the IGM ones show up in a matter of a days or a couple of weeks.

So Bronkus,

You most probably have a herpes infection (as shown by the IGM result). It could be type 1 or type 2. You won't be able to tell for awhile. Have the IGG tests for 1 & 2 done again in 3 months from your last exposure date.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Advertisement

Try a Lysine supplement for cold sores

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      68,829
    • Total Posts
      460,310
  • Posts

    • 2kroc
      Yes, just have sex wearing clothes and a condom, also don't kiss. No disclosure needed.
    • 2kroc
      Have sex  with at least one of you wearing clothes + a condom  next time, if you really want to protect him.
    • 2kroc
      All negative, Except for hepatitis B which is something you're vaccinated (They give you antibodies) against in the military. Before, I go through the trouble of re cropping another damn picture for you. I'd like to ask what your response will be if I show you the results and they're all negative?
    • 2kroc
      Universities receive most of their  funding from Pharma companies. Scientific studies aren't cheap, Pharmaceutical companies aren't going to fund research on food supplements when there's no pay off for them. It's naive to  think big businesses would fund research that'd directly decrease profit.  Then there's the possibility of the pharmaceutical companies bribing the government agencies from genuine health research, to keep themselves in business. https://thevaccinereaction.org/2018/04/big-pharma-pays-universities-for-most-medical-research-in-u-s-today/   Also, No one outside of the research community has the resources/contacts to prove they're cured. Even if they scored a negative on a western blot test/IGg, scrutinizers would just claim the virus was dormant or they never had it at all. Other than blood test, There is no easily accessible method to determine whether or not the virus is completely eradicated from your body.
    • WilsoInAus
      @2kroc where are the results of the three preceding tests?
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.