Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
Bronkus

Negative for HSV 1 and HSV 2, Positive for IGM

Recommended Posts

Bronkus

Hello everyone,

I had a blood test that tested negative for HSV 1 and HSV 2 and I tested positive for IGM. My doctor told me that I must have been exposed within the last 4-12 weeks. He also said that the IGM indicates that I would definitely eventually within a few months have HSV 1 or HSV 2. This didn't really sound right because I read somewhere that 9/10 people have the antibodies in them so can someone clarify this? Could it have been before 4-12 weeks, could IGM evolve into HSV 1 or HSV 2? Please someone help I am really worried. Thank You.

Bronkus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
derk

I too tested positive for IGM but negative for hsv1 and negative for hsv2. They doctor had said i could have recently been exposed and there arent many antibodies built up yet but i haven't had sex in about 7 or 8 months. Yes, its been too long. But i am still concerned because i have had these red itchy bumps for about 3 weeks now, though, they have decrased from around 10 to 3 at the base of the shaft. I am going to get tested again in 3 months. Oh and by the way i was diagnosed with mono about 7 months ago also. Could this affect the results of the IGM? I am stressing myself out severley here and am in need of advice. Thanks in advance guys.

-Derek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RememberToSmile

I have ALWAYS tested positive for IGM (even before I had herpes). The first time I tested positive for IGM was at 18, even at 25 I still tested negative for both HSV 1 and HSV 2. My doctor at first told me the same thing as you all, but then after testing negative for HSV 1 and 2 for years upon years, she did some more research and realized she as wrong (and I was right!)-my IGM was picking up th fact that I had chickenpox and mono as a kid-both from the herpes family but NOT HSV 1 or 2. So, there ya go :-) Hopefully that brings some peace of mind to you both!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,296
    • Total Posts
      466,186
  • Posts

    • MikeHerp
      Hmm, ok , So  there's a copper ribbon.  I didn't know that. Wonder whether people are aware of that.  
    • MikeHerp
      The prophylactic vaccine trial by GSK took 8 years and they were still not done with it.  That's because it takes time to see whether it works--it's a matter of many people having sex over time and that just takes a lot of time.   A shedding study is quicker, so therapeutic vaccines are quicker to test.  5-6 years I think.  Note that there was a study conducted last year that showed that there's a high correlation between shedding and outbreaks, suggesting that it might not even be necessary to track outbreaks, measuring shedding may be enough. It's unclear what they would be proving in case of a gene editing technique.  I think shedding would be a part of it.  But what else, if anything, I don't know. Anyway, it doesn't necessarily have to take a long time like the GSK prophylactic trials.  
    • Miss Horne
      Role play? Dressing up in the bedroom?
    • Voyager2
      I certainly hope this research continues. It all seems legit to me, but again, I'm no medical man (although I did play doctor a few times).   
    • here-to-help
      This is good information to know. To go from continuous outbreaks to none all this time is encouraging. I wonder if after you've given it some time and this regimen proves itself, maybe you could title it, and type it for everyone to read. The more suggestions, the better! You mentioned you've suffered with Herpes I outbreaks. I have suffered with the type II, and I recently read that Lysine doesn't help with the type II. I don't know about that, because it really has helped me in years past. Anyway, by mentioning in your article that you have type I will help, because apparently something might work for type I that won't work for type II. I myself will get these products and add them to my daily garlic regimen, and perhaps I will be able to eat whatever I choose without triggering an outbreak. That's my big problem, wanting to eat the foods that trigger the outbreak!
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.