Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
loaded

Interesting GHSV1 Number

Recommended Posts

loaded

Hello all - first time post on any message board...ever (yeah!).

I have recently acquired GHSV1 via oral sex and I, like most here, am on a mission to get my head around this thing both from an epidemiological and biochemical perspective. Anyway, I was somewhat disheartened to find relatively little GHSV1 specific statistics out there with respect to transmission and asymptotic shedding. There is a bit - I believe I have read most of the pertinent US studies - but they really just brought up more questions than answers. So in an attempt to get just a bit more direction I culled through most of the archived posts both here and at HHP (search words 'HSV1' and 'HSV-1' only) to try and get a better idea as to how exactly people are getting infected with GHSV1. The result is not likely to be a huge surprise, but I found it a bit more comforting seeing as how infecting others is my primary concern.

1) ~92-93% (n=82) of all cases were transmitted via oral to genital.

2) Of those cases that were passed genital to genital, ~85% were passed within the first month after infection (typically before they had their primary OB diagnosed).

3) As for the remaining 15% of genital to genital transmissions, the majority seemed to have been passed around the same time as symptoms were present but it was difficult to be sure on a few of these. There was one case, however, where gen to gen transmission occurred asymptotically with condom use. I am suspect about this one (it is obviously not impossible though), but I threw it in there anyway.

4) There was very little info with respect to genital -> oral transmission.

This is, in no way, a proper scientific study (perhaps just representative of message board posters), but I thought it was interesting. I am totally guessing here, but these number might just reflect the fact that initial OBs of GHSV1 tend to be a bit more painful than those for GHSV2 and so the carries are generally more aware/cautious but......who knows.

If anyone knows of a proper study that addresses this question please let me know.

* BTW, I controlled for double posts (by this i mean the same poster on both boards) and left out anyone that was at all unsure of how infection occurred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jericho

Wow, that is a helluva effort. Thanks for taking the time to do this.

Your findings seem to concur with the general info out there that most GHSV-1 is caused by oral --> genital contact. And that GHSV-1 is most contagious to others genitally during the primary OB.

I imagine we will be learning much more about GHSV-1 over the coming years, as it is spreading relatively rapidly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,741
    • Total Posts
      470,272
  • Posts

    • BioHacker
      Meds and condoms is really all you need. Statistically, HSV2 is so widespread because 80-90% of  people who have it are unaware that they have it, and so they don't take all recommended precautions (including using condoms). Oddly enough, if you were to replace your HSV2+ girlfriend (aware of HSV status, using condoms, using suppressive meds) with the average American woman (unaware of HSV status, but 25% risk, which is average - and using condoms at all times, since presumably you could insist on it), you would actually NOT reduce your risk of HSV2. The statistical risk would be approximately the same for both theoretical girlfriends (about 0.7% per year assuming sex 2x per week). That is a bit simplistic, because maybe you could decide to date only women who are verified virgins (essentially no risk), or maybe "below average risk" in some way (younger than average, fewer prior partners than average, etc.), or you could have all prospective girlfriends IgG blood tested for HSV as a condition to dating them (or having sex with them), which would reduce the risk significantly (especially if you confirmed the paperwork), but not completely (since antibodies take some time to develop). At some point, beyond-standard precautions become inconvenient and not worth the hassle (or risk of being perceived as paranoid). The risk isn't zero, and probably would never be zero, short of taking extreme measures. Efforts to reduce risk beyond standard practices, which already reduce risk to relatively low levels, are naturally subject to the law of diminishing returns. Accepting some level of risk is (unfortunately) part of the deal in most reasonable endeavors. Also, there is statistically a greater likelihood of two people passing HPV between them one way or the other, than HSV2 (assuming all recommended precautions are being taken). Of course, you could get the HPV vaccine (everyone should!). But the vaccine only covers 10-15% of the types of HPV that are out there. And tests for HPV are imperfect, and generally not available for males. And HPV (some types) can cause cancer (cervical, penile, and throat - maybe others). So, keep that in mind as well. And then, of course, there are all the other risks . . . Best not to be paranoid though . . .
    • WilsoInAus
      That’s correct. HIV is a distinct virus. No virus morphs into another one.
    • WilsoInAus
      Hey @thebrightsidegirl I hope you’re going ok, I’ve read your posts and will see if I can draw some threads. I see that you have genital HSV-1 and your partner has oral HSV-1. I’m not sure if he has tested but given it’s somcommon there’s no reason to disbelieve that’s what he has. This is the best concirdant scenario you can hope for in a sexual relationship. You both already have the virus and your immune systems are established and your experience with herpes is your own. You cannot induce an outbreak in each other by virtue your own HSV-1 and transmission to a new location on your partner is too small to worry about. If HSV-2 is present, then it needs to be brought to the relationship. It’s not at all likely you have it given you were infected genitally with HSV-1.  I suggest these symptoms are very unlikely to be related to herpes at all. If they are, then it’s far more likely to be a recurrent outbreak issue with your HSV-1 as opposed to an initial infection with HSV-2. 
    • hopeing
      Ozone is basically toxic to humans at high levels. Its probably as likely to kill your cells as the virus. Add to that the virus is not in the blood and I'd say this 'treatment' is probably totally ineffective and if it does include high levels of real ozone likely dangerous. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_therapy
    • thebrightsidegirl
      Hey Wilson , do you kids answering this , i was kind of worried too ? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.