Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
purpleflamingo

Negative blood tests after 2 yrs and a positive culture

39 posts in this topic

I was diagnosed by swab culture 2 years ago and recently got two blood tests over the last two months to type my HSV. I assumed I have HSV-1 that I contracted genitally from an ex, but for closure reasons, I wanted to be positive.

Both tests came back negative across the board, for both types, each time.

I am dumbfounded and so lost. Trying to research this, as I have not ever heard of situations like this.

I haven't had an outbreak in probably a year or so, and I am not on suppressive therapy medications.

I had my tonsils out in December because I was having ulcers show up on them and I was positive those were related to my HSV.

Anything anybody can tell me would help. Thanks for your time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know which blood test you had done?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was HerpesSelect, or one very similar. I'll look into finding out... would that make a huge difference?

Whats the most accurate blood test?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are probably much more experienced people on here, but as far as I know the Herpeselect is a very reliable test, and that two years is definitely long enough to show up.

I would recommend getting the test again or maybe the westernblot as a confirmation.

Have you had other outbreaks in general? If so the next time you have an outbreak get another swab test.

Maybe the initial swab was wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

Ya that is very weird that you have been cultured positive but negative blood tests. Very weird. I havent heard of that happening either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

positive culture is positive, you can have a WB to confirm but its a huge waste of money at this point. Why did you bother with a blood test anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blood work vs. Culture

Hi! I had a positive swab culture of the sore in question. But I have decided to have bloodwork done as well just to make sure that there wasn't some sort of lab error. You never know, accidents happen. The doctor didn't think it looked like a herpes lesion. I'm not sure which type of bloodtest it was.......igg.......something like that. I will let you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised they didn't type the strain when they did the swab culture.

The HSV-1 ELISA IgG test has a false negative rate of roughly 10%, while the equivalent HSV-2 test has a much smaller false negative rate. This seems to line up with your suspicion that you have GHSV-1.

Since you've had at least 2 outbreaks, and a positive culture, odds are the blood test is giving you a false negative, but I don't think anyone can fault you for wanting confirmation to make sure there wasn't a mixup with the swab culture.

As suggested in a prior post, you can wait for another outbreak and have that cultured, but you could be waiting a long time. Repeating the same blood test probably isn't going to give you meaningfully different results - you may go from <0.90 to some low positive result, but probably not to 3.0+. Did you have both blood tests performed within a short timeframe?

As you probably know, WB is expensive. Another alternative of limited value in this situation is the Biokit HSV-2 test - a negative here, in addition to the negatives from the earlier tests will pretty much rule out HSV-2. But you're still left with the HSV-1 issue.

There's also the HerpeSelect Immunoblot, assuming that your earlier test was the HerpeSelect ELISA. Not sure this can be expected to show a different result, but you might want to check with an expert on STD testing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

U probably wanted to know what type?

You must have wanted to know which type you had? I would want to know too.... I am going to have another type- test as well. My culture was positive (not type sensitive) but my blood (type specific) was negative 9 months later. No break outs since then..... but it is nice to know. I will let you know how mine turns out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also the HerpeSelect Immunoblot, assuming that your earlier test was the HerpeSelect ELISA. Not sure this can be expected to show a different result, but you might want to check with an expert on STD testing.

It is claimed the Immunoblot is not a confirmatory test for the ELISA *however* they list its sensitivity to HSV-1 to be 99% in the Immunoblot and only 92% in the ELISA. I would say it may be a cheaper alternative to a WB if its actually 99% accurate compared to a WB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, I'm not the only one!

Hi all,

10 years ago I contracted HSV-1 oral to genital. I never had another outbreak. 1 year ago I was reminded of that tingling I will never forget. I went to the doctor and she was unconvinced it was an outbreak and treated me for a vaginal infection. I still wasn't feeling better, so I went back to the gyno five days later and got the swab test. It came back positive for HSV-2. I was shocked because my partner had recently been tested and his blood test came back negative. I took antivirals and 6 mos went by without the common reoccurance I read about. I decided to get a blood test. The blood test came back positive HSV-1, negative HSV-2. Maybe this was just a fluke. I got a blood test again four months after (10 months total since possible exposure). Same results--positive HSV-1, negative HSV-2. Are the swab/culture tests really smarter than two blood tests months apart?? I find it hard to believe.

Hope this stupid virus isn't getting you down!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 years ago I contracted HSV-1 oral to genital. I never had another outbreak. 1 year ago I was reminded of that tingling I will never forget. I went to the doctor and she was unconvinced it was an outbreak and treated me for a vaginal infection. I still wasn't feeling better, so I went back to the gyno five days later and got the swab test. It came back positive for HSV-2. I was shocked because my partner had recently been tested and his blood test came back negative. I took antivirals and 6 mos went by without the common reoccurance I read about. I decided to get a blood test. The blood test came back positive HSV-1, negative HSV-2. Maybe this was just a fluke. I got a blood test again four months after (10 months total since possible exposure). Same results--positive HSV-1, negative HSV-2. Are the swab/culture tests really smarter than two blood tests months apart?? I find it hard to believe.
Strange. I would think the odds of a false positive culture (basically an error on the part of the lab techs) would be lower than the odds of a false negative on the blood test. I assume the blood test was an IGG type specific test?

For resolution, you can try another swab culture if you feel any symptoms or go for the WB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same thing happen and have been asking the same questions (see my post directly above yours).

I also think it's pretty common. My friend L (who I met here) got a negative blood test after coming around to accepting and even appreciating having H; My friend K. was so devastated about one positive blood test that she went back and got a second - it was negative and she's so happy about this that she swears to never get tested again.

Certainly it makes conversations harder. All those conversations with people who sound self-righteous and proud of their recent negative blood tests despite having slept with 60 people? Right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well to my knowledge 5 % of the population that is exposed to the virus rejects it. my friend whom is very wealthy used to have cancer. and when his cancer was in remission along with his tests for cancer every 6 months they would do an std test because stds could have more of a effect on him since his immune system was so low. he was married to someone who got cold sores all of the time. she must have kissed him at one point when she had one or was shedding because his doctor informed him that he was exposed and actually expressed concern informing him that because his immune system was so low because of the cancer he would probably getthem realy really bad.

well he never got one and then a year later when he got another std test his hsv exposure came back negative! the virus wasnt in his system :/ he then contacted a disease specialist. his disease specialist did another test for him and said the same thing that he tested negative. she informed him that 5% of the population that is exposed to the virus, just have that immune system that totally rejects the virus and then theyre negative even when they already had positive results.

so maybe this was ur case. when u went you were recently exposed but in all the time thats passed your body rejected it? the only thing thats different between you and him is that he never once had an outbreak and u say u did

Guy12 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

purplegoddess8591

Some people may be "immune" or highly resistant to acquiring HSV, but their immune system can NOT simply fight it off & eradicate it once infected. There is so such thing as only being "exposed;" you either have it or you don't.

As for your friend, I'm assuming he tested positive for HSV I (due to cold sores). He may have tested negative later because even the best tests miss every 1 out of every 10 HSV I infections.

Per Dr. HHH, up to 15% of people don't develop antibodies to HSV I that are detectable on current IgG tests (up to 10% with HSV II) but this isn't his case if he previously tested positive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1day at a time

my friend got tested a few different times after his original positive diagnosis and tested negative for it. i think a disease specialist knows a little bit more than any of us on this site...as well educated as some of us might be.

Dormantsurprise likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a cold sore when I was 15 or 16. I clearly remember my dctor telling my mom: "yes, it is herpes". It never came back. Ten years later, I contracted genital herpes. Then two years later, I took a blood test to see what type I had contrated genitally (I already knew that I had hsv-1 due to my previous coldsore, so basically I wanted to confirm/discard hsv-2)

To my surprise, I was possitive to hsv-2 (IGg was 2.0) and negative to hsv-1. I asked the PA why was that, if that meant that I had hsv-2 orally when I was 15 (note that I starte my sexual activity -even my first kiss- at the age of 18 ) and he said that it was unlikely to have hsv-2 orally, specially when someone is not sexually active.

He said that probably, my body handled the hsv-1 well, and it went to undetectable values???

Anyhow, I will never have the answer to that. I do know however that I have g-hsv-2.

Purpleflamingo, the human body is a mistery. Anything can happen. And humans make mistakes; some other people call it miracles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a person is infected w/ HSV, it's there for life. Yes, it is possible for HSV to fall to undetectable values (or not be picked up on tests, especially due to their lack of sensitivity to HSV I). But that does not mean the body has successfully rejected or eradicated the virus. I, too, have seen people test negative multiple times after testing positive....but later, unfortunately, had an outbreak or another positive test.

You would think that a disease specialist would know everything, but the sad truth is, they don't. Most doctors -- even specialists -- are shockingly ignorant when it comes to HSV. I base everything of what I say on 3 STD specialists who have a cumulative experience in HSV of 100 years.

But of course, everyone will believe the specialists they choose to believe. I firmly believe that the virus remains in the body for life (until we find some kind of cure or something close to it). That's just my opinion, though & I realize not everyone holds those views.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with what 1DayAtATime is saying - once the virus reaches the nerves, there is no way for the body to attack the viral copies stored in the nerve cells. It is permanent at that point.

pazdelmar, your situation has a relatively simple explanation. Assuming the initial cold sore diagnosis was correct, you probably fall into the ~10% of HSV1+ people who test negative via IGG tests. If you want to pursue your HSV1 status, you can try the WB test which uses more antigens than the Herpeselect or Captia IGG tests.

For those who are interested, a great resource on technical HSV issues is windy over at the racoon forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses!

Thanks for sharing your experiences. After the swab was typed as "HSV-2" in January of this year I haven't had anymore outbreaks. Also confused about that because everything I read says you should probably have a reoccurance within the first year of contracting HSV-2. I think I will just spend the $ and get a Western Blot test. Is the WB test as accurare as a swab test? Thanks for your advice and I will let you know the results if I find a place that does WB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i tested pos in june, culture, negative early this month, bloodtest. gonna get retested in a few months. but glad to know it does happen. all the responses are great too. lets see what happens!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here

I had a DNA PCR test on dry intact skin and got a positive for HSV-2 . But at 14 weeks got a negative on IGG test. I wish I had never gotten the DNA test now. The director of the lab said it was 100% reliable. But, then again, what else would he say? Assuming someone gets positive on this test or a culture of a lesion, what would a Western Blot prove? How could a person ever get past the fact that they got a positive on the culture or DNA test when those 2 tests are supposed to be the gold standard and since it is accepted that some people just don't develop antibodies? I have to decide what to do. But I am inclined to get the WB test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so sometimes i think... ok, dude you tested positive once, and went for the test cause you had symptoms, mild, but symptoms. you have it. for some odd reason your blood work is coming back negative, which is awesome for my mental state of mind, but what REALLY is going on.

ok so lets say i, and apparently others out there too, have it, but also have undetectable antibodies.

what would be a cause for this?

and what does the fact that i'm part of small persentage of people that has undetectable antibodies even mean?

and especially, what does this mean as far as transmission??

hmmmmm......

not really looking for answers, just thinking out loud

Guy12 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

reply

Well, I don't knoiw the answer. 3 doctors have told me I DON'T have it based upon the blood test. If everyone else who says they are relying on the blood tests to say they are negative, why shouldn't I. If these other people took the DNA PCR test, they might test positive too! So, just because I took the DNA test doesn't negate the blood test results. For Dr. Hook at medhelp.com to tell people that they do not have herpes because of their negative result on the basis of their blood test results means that he thinks the blood test is definitive. Otherwise, he would be telling people "U tested negative on the blood test, but to rule out HSV-2 you have to get a negative on the DNA test too." But he doesan't tell people that. So why should my blood test reuslts be any less definitive than a person who did not take the DNA test at all. This means that EVERY PERSON who has tested negative on the blood test might possibly get a positive on the DNA test. BUT THEY ARE RELYING SOLELY ON THE BLOOD TEST!!! That means that literally millions of people who THINK that they are negative based solely on the blood test results may, in fact, have HSV-2!! Wonder how Dr. Hook and friends would answer that dilemna?? I bet they can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Latest Buzz

    • Free73
      I too had a bunch of OCD's and being diagnosed with HSV2 has helped me to get over my OCD. I have learned that life can be very random and there really is nothing we can do to control our lives (short of living in a cocoon). So i have reached acceptance with herpes (doesn't mean i like it, just reached acceptance) and i now use that in other aspects of life. Just let go and life will be ok, herpes or not.
    • honey_6974
      I was alluding to the rumours and since-deleted posts around Halford's research. Just because information is OTR, doesn't mean it doesn't come from a clinical trial. Choosing to ignore these extra bits of information is choosing to live in radio silence, which is unbearable for many. Since I did use the words “vaccine research information”, I'm not sure if I didn't communicate clearly enough, or if you're erecting a straw man.
    • shelifestill
      Learning you have herpes can be devastating, particular when your love life is in flux. When someone is newly diagnosed, the thought of dating with herpes can fill with such anxiety that they may wonder if they will never find love again. Some people may ask question that, why dating with herpes so stressful? After herpes diagnosis, people may worried about the judge, might be scared they could share herpes to their future partner, or simply be terrified about how they are going to face the world. Fortunately, it turns out that most of the time dating with herpes isn't nearly as scary as worry about it. You should know how to handle “The Talk” while you are dating. The following tips may help you. Forget “The Talk”, it’s just a normal date You are not diseases after herpes diagnosis, it may be difficult to think about anything other than the fact you have it, but that is all it is --- a ‘gift’ that is continuing to be given. One of the toughest thing you should remember when dating is that mostly it's just dating -- an activity fraught with the potential for drama, pain, and heartbreak for pretty much everyone. So get over the fear of stigma, everybody may have it, so it’s OK that nothing you should worry too much. Meanwhile, sharing your experience in herpes dating communities such as MPWH would help you release your anxiousness. Be honest. Which is always the key If you like someone enough each other, herpes can be just something you have to work with, like snoring or an affection for mornings. One thing that you need to do is always to be honest. Genuineness, trust and openness are absolutely vital parts in a relationship — and having a herpes doesn't change that, said Susan Gilbert, communications director for the National Coalition for Sexual Health. Telling your partners about your situation can raise health concerns. But remember, choose the right time with reasonable ways. Keep sex safe For few exceptions, people don't date solely because they want to have sex. They date because they love each other and find each other interesting and attractive when those other things are true, a herpes diagnosis often doesn't seem like that a big deal. But do remember, safe sex is necessary. The National Coalition for Sexual Health advises that, after abstinence, condoms are the best method to reduce the risk of transmitting STDs. If you don't know your own status, or that of your partner, use condoms every time, Gilbert said. Enlightening an accomplice regarding wellbeing worries that can influence him or her is dependably a basic, specialists said. Yet, the amount to reveal, or when, can rely on upon the case. There's a major distinction between a past contamination that has been dealt with and cured, and something long lasting, said Gilbert, who gives sexual wellbeing data and intends to empower exchange about the point. It's an unquestionable requirement before anything advances to the sexual domain. Simply don't freeze—it doesn’t should be a first-date discussion, specialists concurred. --- Originated post: https://www.mpwh.com/herpes-dating-blog/dating-with-herpes--how-to-manage--the-talk--in-your-dating-124
    • shelifestill
      Learning you have herpes can be devastating, particular when your love life is in flux. When someone is newly diagnosed, the thought of dating with herpes can fill with such anxiety that they may wonder if they will never find love again. Some people may ask question that, why dating with herpes so stressful? After herpes diagnosis, people may worried about the judge, might be scared they could share herpes to their future partner, or simply be terrified about how they are going to face the world. Fortunately, it turns out that most of the time dating with herpes isn't nearly as scary as worry about it. You should know how to handle “The Talk” while you are dating. The following tips may help you. Forget “The Talk”, it’s just a normal date You are not diseases after herpes diagnosis, it may be difficult to think about anything other than the fact you have it, but that is all it is --- a ‘gift’ that is continuing to be given. One of the toughest thing you should remember when dating is that mostly it's just dating -- an activity fraught with the potential for drama, pain, and heartbreak for pretty much everyone. So get over the fear of stigma, everybody may have it, so it’s OK that nothing you should worry too much. Meanwhile, sharing your experience in herpes dating communities such as MPWH would help you release your anxiousness. Be honest. Which is always the key If you like someone enough each other, herpes can be just something you have to work with, like snoring or an affection for mornings. One thing that you need to do is always to be honest. Genuineness, trust and openness are absolutely vital parts in a relationship — and having a herpes doesn't change that, said Susan Gilbert, communications director for the National Coalition for Sexual Health. Telling your partners about your situation can raise health concerns. But remember, choose the right time with reasonable ways. Keep sex safe For few exceptions, people don't date solely because they want to have sex. They date because they love each other and find each other interesting and attractive when those other things are true, a herpes diagnosis often doesn't seem like that a big deal. But do remember, safe sex is necessary. The National Coalition for Sexual Health advises that, after abstinence, condoms are the best method to reduce the risk of transmitting STDs. If you don't know your own status, or that of your partner, use condoms every time, Gilbert said. Enlightening an accomplice regarding wellbeing worries that can influence him or her is dependably a basic, specialists said. Yet, the amount to reveal, or when, can rely on upon the case. There's a major distinction between a past contamination that has been dealt with and cured, and something long lasting, said Gilbert, who gives sexual wellbeing data and intends to empower exchange about the point. It's an unquestionable requirement before anything advances to the sexual domain. Simply don't freeze—it doesn’t should be a first-date discussion, specialists concurred. --- Originated post: https://www.mpwh.com/herpes-dating-blog/dating-with-herpes--how-to-manage--the-talk--in-your-dating-124
    • Stronginsepa
    • dont quit!
      Cool, I stay in Southern California. Keep me posted on your progress. PM me as well.  I'm also going to get Halfords vaccine when/if ever available. I figure as long as it's safe we have nothing to lose and also gives us relief until we can figure this shit out. I hear it may be as soon as next year. That may be a good meeting place if we manage to go to St. Kitts at the same time. I will do what I can to assist. Holla.
    • OhFuckMyDickHurts
      I'm in California. I would but I also wish it was more refined and that he tested different strains of HSV-2 in the lab. AuRx decades ago showed a less virulent strain of HSV being mutated (they did ICP10 delta PK) generated more antibodies. I haven't seen such comparisons ever published by him thus I suspect he hasn't flushed everything out yet. He did hit on a good mutation taking away NLS of ICP0 as it keeps ICP0 out of the nucleus which would set off a harmful chain reaction. Otherwise I believe there are also still other ORF to modify IMHO, like ICP10. I wish him the best of luck and hope he moves forward in his goals.  As for Injecting directly the DRG. It is seductive as again I know it will saturate the neurons with the vector but it's a very delicate procedure and there could be a tiny vein in the way depending on injection site. I don't know I would trust them...  further with the intended vector it may require multiple shots if given even in cerebrospinal fluid as it only expresses 7-9 days and HSV has to replicate for CRISPR to really work - as far as we know right now. 
    • Lisajd
      Some people cant see beyond whats going on for them. We all want a cure but until such time you have to deal with it.  It wont kill you
    • Lisajd
      Yes it is the better one to have. Less symptoms and less risk.  If you cant accept it then you are going to have ongoing issues mentally and physically. The 2 go hand in hand
    • Penumbra
      Nothing in what you say contradict the official shedding rate of HSV1 genital, nor what Doctor Terri Waren mentionned about HSV1 Genital to genital transmission. Reply with your smartass comments all you want, I'll take the word of a knowm herpes expert over yours any day.  I care so much about you, that I'm actually not going to reply to your next smartass reply. For anyone reading this thread, try looking at the bright side of a situation. Of course it will make things a bit more complicated and can be frustrating/painful at times, but things should get better with time. - Shedding rate of HSV1 genitally is much lower than HSV2 genitally. - According to Terri Waren, genital to genital transmission of HSV1 is much rarer than HSV2. Don't give up, you can overcome this.  Never let this virus define who you are.  
  • Featured