Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
struggle83

What is "wild type" and how is it different/tested?

Recommended Posts

struggle83

I keep hearing about wild type hsv.

What is wild type?

How does it differ from the regular type?

Does it respond to antivirals?

Does it show up in PCR DNA tests?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hfighter

Hi struggle83

I'm not sure, but in order of your questions:

Wild type: a herpes virus (VHS-1 or VHS-2) that is active all the time because it has gained resistence to commun antivirals like Acyclovir.

What does different to reglar type: it is hard to treat due to its resistence.

Response to antivirals: it does not response to aciclovir (thanks God we have famciclovir and other treatments so they can be used in these cases).

PCR DNA: maybe the same the regular does.

Note: As my doctor told me if you are having so much ob is more like to be caused by your immune status rhather that the virus itself. The regular type becomes a "wild type" when you are immunocomprised and have taken acyclivir long term (like inn supresive theraphy) so the virus never stop to replicate even when you are "punching" it with aciclovyr.

At last.... that what I understand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
death2herpes

you have that backwards. wild type is generic type that has NOT acquired any special characteristics (like resistance) through mutation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
struggle83
you have that backwards. wild type is generic type that has NOT acquired any special characteristics (like resistance) through mutation.

So then why would I worry about having it? If it is NOT resistant than why would it ever bother anyone since it would be easily managed with anti-virals? These are serious questions. I am not being sarcastic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
death2herpes

you should not worry about wild type. it has no resistance. wild type is the good type ; )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
camomile

I think, this is a reasonable question (struggle's).

It seems there are milder infections in some people and intractable ones. In fact, there are H that remain asymptomatic. Whilst I appreciate what Hfighter mentions, I am beginning to wonder if it is exclusively and solely the hosts "immune function" which would determine the sequelae.

Knowing H seems to respond to strict H dietary therapy and certain amino acid therapy well, that may be to do with the hosts body chemistry. Some ppl are lucky enough to have the body chemistry which H dislikes and that makes H dormant?

Obviously I am a total lay person and wouldn't claim this to be accurate but I lived long enough with H. I don't particularly think you need to have an obvious weak immunity to suffer from H at all (though I admit immuno-suppressed individuals with HIV would suffer significantly within reason)

It's more than just one level (immunity) is the causation of intractable H knowing the body is a complex machine. It's multi-factorial including immune system and many other factors.

As for strains of H, I'm really not sure. I did hear that HPV has hundreds of strains. As some ppl claim on this site that how bad you would experience, may be to do with how bad your original exposure to H infection?

It's always interesting when someone isn't afraid of asking. xx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
death2herpes

the frequency and severity of recurrence is a function of many variables like initial viral inoculating load (and therefore established latent pool), immune system response (there is a particular known genetic characteristic for example which predisposes one to more frequent outbreaks which can now be tested for, i don't recall the details but this is discussed in another thread), and so on.

but the question was asked specifically about wild type and it has been answered. this is not HSV-specific terminology. any virus of wild type means it has not developed any special properties through mutation selection pressure (like drug resistance), it is just ordinary virus type, that's all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
struggle83

Ok, thanks for the responses. I won't worry about wild but I will worry about resistance and genetic response. I think they can test the viral DNA for level of resistance, yes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
death2herpes

i have no idea about the expense or availability of that kind of testing. but HSV rarely develops resistance even when it is subjected to the selection pressure of suppressive antiviral therapy so a random infection will rarely be with resistant type. so i think that unless you have (a) been taking suppressive antivirals for a long time and (B) have noticed a marked decrease in their effectiveness there is no reason to consider this.

anyway, i think if you had a vatrex-resistant strain if you were to discontinue suppressive antivirals you would remove the selection filter so wild type would probably reemerge. i am not sure why you want to conduct exotic tests for resistance if there is nothing unusual about your symptoms or how they respond to antivirals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
camomile
there is a particular known genetic characteristic for example which predisposes one to more frequent outbreaks which can now be tested for

You must be a biological graduate student :)

Would you care to share the link of the thread describing such "genetic" aspect in humans?

Thanks a million x x x x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
camomile

And another...PCR DNA test, is that only done in research levels at the moment? Am I correct in this? Cheers :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
struggle83
You must be a biological graduate student :)

Would you care to share the link of the thread describing such "genetic" aspect in humans?

Thanks a million x x x x

Do you mean a biology graduate? It is well known that genetics play a role in almost every aspect of our lives including medicine and disease. Soon, you will undergo a DNA test before you are given medicines in order to guage treatment effectiveness. This is already being done for some medications today. The days of the antiquated doctor are numbered. After all, the doctor has been around since the Greeks (Hippocrates). It's time they were modernized (and phased out) like the rest of the world. Good riddance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
camomile

You are always so ahead of us, Struggle :D

I agree completely with you there. I oft find that diagnostic processes are unreasonable to patients who suffer from serious chronic illnesses. Sometimes, it takes years to diagnose something or worse, if doctors cannot find what they hoped they should be able to find in patients, doctors think patients are dismissed as "mental". There seems to be awful lot of frustration and stress in patients not because of diseases they suffer from but the attitude of "Doctors" who are fixated on their textbook approach which diseases tend to "ignore".

I agree that medical approach to different diseases is often archaic (only scratching the surface) and drug therapies often not effective and causes more suffering to patients.

In other level, if doctors are not helpful or if they don't care, they shouldn't call themselves "doctors". Certainly, they should remind themselves of Hippocratic Oath sworn when they graduated from the Medical School.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
struggle83

Check out www.inod.org

Autopsies reveal that approximately 40% of diagnoses are incorrect. In two-thirds of those cases, medical help could have been provided had the diagnosis been correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
death2herpes
You must be a biological graduate student :)

Would you care to share the link of the thread describing such "genetic" aspect in humans?

Thanks a million x x x x

i was referring to herpesDX, which tests for a particular genetic mutation: http://www.herpes-coldsores.com/messageforum/showthread.php?24976

nah, i have a phd in theoretical physics so this is not my field at all. i just read about herpes like most people here. my understanding is superficial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
struggle83
i was referring to herpesDX, which tests for a particular genetic mutation: http://www.herpes-coldsores.com/messageforum/showthread.php?24976

nah, i have a phd in theoretical physics so this is not my field at all. i just read about herpes like most people here. my understanding is superficial.

I've also got a degree in physics. We should chat offline. I don't work in the field but I would be interested in hearing about you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
camomile
i was referring to herpesDX, which tests for a particular genetic mutation: http://www.herpes-coldsores.com/messageforum/showthread.php?24976

nah, i have a phd in theoretical physics so this is not my field at all. i just read about herpes like most people here. my understanding is superficial.

Thanks for that :D Sooooo Helpful :) Have a great evening x x x x x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
death2herpes
I've also got a degree in physics. We should chat offline. I don't work in the field but I would be interested in hearing about you.

yeah, we should. i am not currently working in the field either. might go back to academics though. i was mostly doing QFT / diff geo stuff (BRST, ghosts, anomalies and index theorems, etc). what were you studying?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
struggle83
yeah, we should. i am not currently working in the field either. might go back to academics though. i was mostly doing QFT / diff geo stuff (BRST, ghosts, anomalies and index theorems, etc). what were you studying?

My focus in school was particle physics and QM. The school I went to had a strong particle physics faculty with several profs working at McMaster on some cutting edge projects so that made for good inspiration/motivation. I am not familiar with BRST, ghosts, anomalies and index theorems. You will have to explain those to me. The maths at graduate level was most challenging. I now design global corporate infrastructure for Fortune 100 companies. A bit of a departure but both require extreme analytical skills that can't be learned. I also taught college for a while. I am also an amateur bodybuilder (remnant from athletics) and music recording artist (songwriter, producer and guitars). I sure miss college. Things were simpler back then!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
death2herpes
My focus in school was particle physics and QM. The school I went to had a strong particle physics faculty with several profs working at McMaster on some cutting edge projects so that made for good inspiration/motivation. I am not familiar with BRST, ghosts, anomalies and index theorems. You will have to explain those to me. The maths at graduate level was most challenging. I now design global corporate infrastructure for Fortune 100 companies. A bit of a departure but both require extreme analytical skills that can't be learned. I also taught college for a while. I am also an amateur bodybuilder (remnant from athletics) and music recording artist (songwriter, producer and guitars). I sure miss college. Things were simpler back then!

well, any skill is learned, by definition ; )

it's kind of hard to explain those things in a cliff notes version. BRST is a symmetry (similar to supersymmetry) involving anticommuting parameters (ghost fields). it acts as a proxy symmetry to replace broken gauge symmetry when one fixes a gauge to do the functional integral (quantization). anomalies are basically violation of some classical conservation laws when one quantizes a theory. the violating term is usually some topological invariant. index theorems relate such invariants to index of certain differential operators (an index is the difference between the # of zero modes of an operator and its adjoint). actually, there are many interesting ways to relate these things. but this is not the place to discuss it. but if you are interested i'd suggest "anomalies in quantum field theory" by bertlmann, for a good introduction which i think is as close to self-contained w/o being useless as you will find on this subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,304
    • Total Posts
      466,290
  • Posts

    • jmherped
      Quest, what is your protocol exactly for taking out a breakout in 24 to 48 hours?
    • jeraldpeabody
      @MikeHerp totally agree and understand! so i would say the first port of call is to somehow bring all these different voices together and work out a good way to collaborate. I've contacted some of the people on instagram / youtube that have fairly big followers but I have yet to hear back from them. I might try another tactic!  What are you thoughts on trying to have a central point of information / communication for the movement ? is it worth setting up a discord / slack kinda messaging app ? for example i can't use this forum on my phone at all, I have to be at my lappy to use it. I also appreciate what Rich does, but he has very few followers on social if you compare him to alot of the female voices on there. LaureenHD is prob the biggest herpes advocate I can find out there with a large following. I'll reach out to her again.. 
    • jmherped
      Does anybody know what an extreme dive in the chamber like the one the diver who was cured would do to a person?  Is it painful/dangerous, or do you just go in and out like nothing happened? 
    • jmherped
      This looks very promising...  I'm in Cabo and they have one of these for divers at the hospital.  I'm going to check into the cost.  John146, are you still using your home machine? 
    • MikeHerp
      Right.  I agree that goals are important. 1.  I want to continue to raise money for FHC.  I don't think it has to be that far off as you mentioned, though, as you noted, it still needs a bit of time.  I have a feeling we'll be surprised how quickly progress is made, and the FDA does not seem intent on slowing the progress this time.  Further, once human trials actually start and this stuff starts to show it's quite effective, I think things will become a bit more optimistic for the rest of us even if completing the trials still takes some time.  That's how I see it.  Of course, it's possible that it all fails, it hits huge roadblocks etc. There is that risk.  But I believe this gene editing stuff is here to stay.  Every serious analysis of futuristic technologies I've reviewed, seems to think so as well.  Also, the more important thing is what I wrote at the bottom in boldface--we can make things happen, we can change or at least bend the reality if we try.  In my view, that's more important than how far away something might seem. We've had several veterans here chime in, like @Cas9 who are older, who have dealt with this for decades even, and they aren't even sure whether they will be around when a cure or partial cure gets rolled out (I think Cas9 will get it in his life though), but they still urge us not to give up hope, that there's more momentum now than there used to be.  That's more important than the notion that something might still take some time.   2.  We can get behind other research efforts / trials.  As somebody else mentioned, once pritelivir completes its phase 2, we can begin writing to the FDA to have it approved, to allow it to be tested in not immunocompromised patients.  That kind of grass roots movement will be easier if it is concentrated, coordinated. 3.  We may consider looking at other fund raisers.  Other things may emerge and there are people who are working on herpes stuff (like Doctor Iwasaki) who need money.  But at this time. I don't want to get side tracked.  Ive also been carefully watching Rich Mancuso's efforts regarding theravax.  My only issue with it is that his petitions are asking the FDA to fast track Therevax. But the vaccine hasn't even been submitted to the FDA for testing, so it doesn't seem like it makes much sense to petition the FDA to fast rack it now.  As far as I know, the FDA can't fast-track something that hasn't even entered the process.  But, Thiel has invested close to $10 million in it, and if it does get into human trials, we could consider joining forces with Rich to highlight that and maybe write appropriate letters to the FDA.   4.  As you mentioned, raising awareness. Across various platforms and across various geographical regions.   Hopefully also converting more people to our cause.  For example, @hsv2fighter mentioned to me that he is trying to put together an association of Chinese HSV patients.  I imagine there must be millions.  And with ppl in China being increasingly connected to the internet, I think there could be many with whom we can unite. Likewise, that kind of channel could give us a better view on what they are doing in China with gene editing etc.   5.  As you mentioned, unifying people to show how large and important the movement is, and the need for more funding and research etc. 6.  I believe relevant additional goals will emerge on which we can act, and if we have unified, it will be easier to act.  Most of the time, even if somebody has some good idea to do something, not a lot can be done because people aren't coordinated.  Somebody creates a petition, and maybe 5 people sign it.  Look, the whole FHC fund raiser didn't exist 2 months ago, but came into existence because I reached out to FHC and they were responsive to and supportive of the idea.  So that was good.  But that alone might not have accomplished much if the good folks at Honeycomb, hadn't not only pinned the post about the fund raiser, but also given it their informal seal of approval.  And now, because of all that, we've raised over $10k, and that's only based on mainly small donations in a few weeks from our community.  We haven't even really targeted any deep pockets (we've barely tried) or done a lot to sell the case, rather, we've mainly just donated ourselves. All that stuff happened because people worked together.   The point is that, we can make things happen, bigger things, if we try.  That's what I'd like to focus on more than the idea that something might be far away or it's hard to do something.   Anyway, thanks for your efforts.  This stuff is easier when others are also contributing and you are helping a lot.        
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.