Jump to content

Can You Sue Someone For an STD?

Recommended Posts

in my very personal opinion-i say yes and no-their is risk involved in everything we do-including sex-the only way to to avoid catching an STD via sex is to abstain totally from any form. though if u share a drink with someone u could catch oral herpes and it become an STD even though didn't participate in sex. i think in cases of rape-yes u should be able to sue--u obviously had no choice and the risk was forced upon u--i think in cases of a deadly std--yes if the person had previously been diagnosed and there was evidence that could prove that. but in most instances we have choice-we can ask the other person to get tested and if they refuse to get tested for us then that may raise a red flag and we don't have to have sex with them. if there was no evidence of a previously deadly std then its highly unlikely that u would have any case in court--becuz where is ur evidence? some people don't get tested regularly bcuz they don't care or don't know better. under the circumstances u have to be the ultimate decision maker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a pre-law student, so I looked this up.

A few states have criminal statutes against nondisclosure of herpes, but most don't.

Civilly, you can be sued for spreading herpes if:

1.) You know you have it

2.) You don't tell your partner

3.) Your partner contracts it

4.) There is no doubt that you were the one who gave it to your partner.

The case won't go anywhere if it was casual sex, and taking precautions such as antivirals and condoms is sometimes used as a defense for nondisclosure. If it was someone you were involved with for a long time, the courts will be more in the favor of the person who wasn't disclosed to, regardless of precautions.

A few people have sued successfully, so look up a firm that specializes in negligence, fraud, and misrepresentation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh what states would those be?

The fact that the virus can lay dormant in your system for up to decades leaves d) in your list to be ludicrous.

There is not a single state (or country) where disclosure is legally or medically required so how can someone be legally liable for not telling? That makes absolutely no sense. And suing for contracting a virus that 1 in 4 or even 1 in 3 carry? Even more ludicrous.

This whole thing makes no sense. A rational, level-headed judge would throw any herpes-related law suit out in a minute.

"The case won't go anywhere if it was casual sex, and taking precautions such as antivirals and condoms is sometimes used as a defense for nondisclosure. If it was someone you were involved with for a long time, the courts will be more in your favor, regardless of precautions."

What authorities do you have for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, you can sue someone ONLY IF they never told you that they had an STD. My mother and I were having a discussion about this yesterday. She even told me that as soon as your doctor knows that you have a STD, they HAVE to put your name into a database so that you are registered...sounds kind of wack (as if we are inmates or something) but yeah...you can


just out of curiousity--where are your sources for the database if you have an STD? if it is so, then it is, but i've just never heard of such a thing. i could understand with HIV since now it is mainly spread via sex since precautions are available to screen via blood and organ donations (though that doesn't always work). i've had to fill out special waivers when getting tested for HIV saying that it would be reported to some special authority if i tested positive for HIV. but for nothing else. it just kind of sounds like a gossipy misnomer in my opinion. so if u test positive for HSV 1 and 2 via bloodwork your name would be put into a database even though u may have never had an ob? what if u had both orally? the whole database just sounds a little hokey to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The idea isn't to report on deadly diseases, it's to report on damaging ones. The longer that herpes is in your body, the less damage it does because it gets milder (no permanent damage, so to speak). The longer that you have syphilis (it's syphilis, not chlamydia -- I misspoke earlier) or gonorrhea in your body, the more damage it does - infertility, insanity, etc. So if someone is running around passing them and the other person doesn't know that they get it and, for example, that person ends up with permanent damage. So it's in everyone's best interest to catch these early on. Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 years later...

Should I sue

If I got herpes from receiving oral sex and asked before receiving it,the 3rd party denied at the time said she tested negative before. and then tested positive after, and if i test positive but my gf is negative and i haven't had sex with her after the incident with the other person happened that is solid basis for proof correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few things:

-Did you test negative before the encounter? If not then you could possibly be blamed for transmitting to the other person if you are now both positive;

-Blood tests are not always 100% accurate; the encounter could've tested negative but not waiting long enough after an encounter for her to have HSV show up and may have actually believed she was negative;

-Your gf being negative has nothing to do with anything because you could've had it, not know and not given it to her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The short answer to your question is "No, you should not". The longer answer can be found in a couple of the more recent threads in the Justice and the Law section.

For one, as UserID noted, the situation you described does not constitute proof in the slightest that the "3rd party" has given you this. You could have had herpes for years and not have ever given it to your girlfriend. Conversely, if your girlfriend tests positive (and statistically speaking, that's very likely, considering more than 60 percent of adult women will), that is not evidence that you didn't get it from the 3rd party. To put it simply, you can't know.

That you would think your girlfriend's status has a bearing on the situation suggests to me that you have a lot to learn about herpes. Perhaps once you have done a little bit more research on what herpes actually is, you might start to realize why attempting to sue somebody over it is more than a little silly.

Even if the 3rd Party gave you the virus, something completely unprovable, it's very possible that she didn't know that she had it.

She says she has tested negative, but to what? Since you got this from oral sex (if you did indeed get this from her), most likely it is HSV-1. It's very possible that she had only been tested for HSV-2, come out negative, and had no idea that she had oral herpes. Or, she may have known that she had cold sores, but have had no idea that cold sores are in fact herpes, and can be transmitted to the genitals. Surprisingly few people in the English-speaking world do.

Anyway, that you think getting herpes is something worth suing over is a sad indication of how out of control the stigma has gotten.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

It's incredibly ridiculous to even entertain the thought of suing over cold sores...BUT here in America we love to sue. The truth is you can sue for anything. Sue Marlboro for giving you lung cancer, sue mcdonalds for making you obese, sue the person on the sunway who sneezed on you and gave you a cold.......you get my point. The problem with herpes is, it is extremely common but the general knowledge about it is pitiful. It is never included in an std panel, so most people are cluless to their status. Since most people have never been tested, once they test positive, its only a guess as to who gave it to them. Unless you are a nun who was raped or going after a rich celebrity who will settle out of court to shut you up, I'd say it is almost impossible case to win. You hear about the rare case of someone winning, but look at OJ and Casey Anthony. The justice system is far from perfect. In a nutshell, Yes you can sue over herpes. No I wouldnt recommend it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

I did....he settled out of court....as soon as my lawyer requested/examined his medical records. It was quite some time ago. Have spent the last 4 years battling with resurrent aseptic meningits...too many to count...verified by PCR....should have sued for more!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Donate

    If Honeycomb has helped you, please help us by making a donation so we can provide you with even better features and services.

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • 0_unsure-if-it-is-herpes.png

    Nervous about dating with herpes? Skip "the talk" and browse profiles here.

  • Posts

    • Cas9
      Yes, FHC research is all about a full fledged cure (i.e. a sterilization cure). It's not a vaccine. The latent virus is the virus that resides in ganglionic neurons permanently. When the latent virus reactivates (i.e. replicates), it causes shedding, or an actual OB. There are the ganglion along the spine called the Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG).  HSV infection of the DRG, specifically at the base of the spine, causes genital herpes. Then there's the ganglion on the sides of the face/head.  HSV infection of that ganglion causes oral herpes. The FHC work involves transporting a gene editor to the neurons in the ganglion mentioned above. That gene editor cuts the latent viral DNA in two locations, to eliminate it; i.e. a sterilizing cure. A functional cure, for example, would be something like, stopping the latent virus from replicating, but the latent virus would remain in the ganglion neurons. Stopping it from replicating would prevent OBs and shedding. Of course any therapeutic vaccine is also welcome. I mean, if it reduces OBs and shedding by 80%+, that's very helpful, and it gets closer to a functional cure, but not quite.
    • AlexUobby
      @WilsoInAusI got a Roche test today. And my HSV II igg value is 0.07. It seems that I wasn't infected. Thank you so much for all those help!!! So grateful!!!
    • Honey7575
      Hello did you get relief? I have this problem and it begin afrer I got herpes. Recurring knife cutS on rectum
    • Honey7575
      I believe what you are saying. This is the forum that everyone can share their own symptoms. I am alsa having knife cuts regularly on my anal area afrer herpes and went many doctors. Now trying suppressive antiviral. Hope it works
    • Goran123
      I have my hopes on FHC, but a full fledged cure? This virus hibernate in our spine and can lay dormant there for a lifetime as our immune defense can not get there, I have high hopes but will take a functional cure for now ASAP i am tired of this shit.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.