Jump to content

Halford continues proving mice vaccination effectiveness


Juggalo

Recommended Posts

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0145228

Halford Paper, recent. The live vaccine from Halford makes many mice survive extreme HSV2 chalenge, so for protection purposes it is very very effective (nearly 100% in healthy vaccinatedmice). Too bad it was not tested deeply for therapeutic purposes.

Let's hope that Halford and his company Rational Vaccines enters the game soon, while in the meanwhile Admedus, Genocea and Sanofi are pushing midway through cinical trials.

Edited by Juggalo
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How come they NEVER test for therapeutic effect in mice? Even when they claim the main aim of it is therapeutic like with Admedus, they still don't test for therapeutic effect on mice!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, VVK said:

Halford's vaccine is also meant to be preventative, not therapeutic.

Its not, not meant to be therapeutic. But yea, preventative is the main aim.

He also says its certainly more likely to be therapeutic than the other vaccines. And he said its likely it has a strong therapeutic effect but he cannot be sure either way until it is tested. 

But if other vaccines have small therapeutic effects. Why wouldn't a halford vaccine that is meant to elicit a response thousands of times more powerful also have a therapeutic effect? You'd expect it would also be therapeutic only much more so.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Herbfresh said:

Its not, not meant to be therapeutic. But yea, preventative is the main aim.

He also says its certainly more likely to be therapeutic than the other vaccines. And he said its likely it has a strong therapeutic effect but he cannot be sure either way until it is tested. 

But if other vaccines have small therapeutic effects. Why wouldn't a halford vaccine that is meant to elicit a response thousands of times more powerful also have a therapeutic effect? You'd expect it would also be therapeutic only much more so.

 

 

It stands to reason that Halford's vaccine would have a therapeutic effect. 

The body would be injected with his 0DLNS virus (or whatever its called), which exposes the immune system to a larger proportion of the virus than Subunits, thus allowing immune surveillance to recognise the initial infection much better. (this is a wholly simplified version of what it would do, but basically it would improve your immune surveillance, leading to less breakouts and potentially less viral shedding, who knows, only time will tell),

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yeah, I like that Dr. Halford is careful in his statements.. but really it's incredibly unlikely that all the very effective antibodies that his vaccine creates wouldn't be super helpful for keeping the virus under control... Looking forward to the trials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr. Halford is no dummy. He knows these therapeutic vaccines are a waste.  I commend him to working on prevention of further spread of this virus and I hope it works.  If it works therapeutically, great.... But I think it'll be short-lived relief at a premium cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The therapeutic results of a live attenuated vaccine for herpes exists in the bodies of every single person whose immune system is functioning properly and has successfully adapted to HSV.

i.e. little to no symptoms, but with some shedding

Fighting the virus from within is harder than stopping the virus from coming into the body in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Genocea hit a 58% decrease in shedding for 6 months. I don't see why Halfords live vaccine wouldn't be able to hit a solid 70% decrease in shedding for a year or possibly two. For 2016 we have Acam 529 results at the end of calendar year and a possible Halford trial with results. We can only hope that these trials change the way research is done for this condition.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. Genocea will improve. I think Halford will be great for ppl who haven't been infected with herpes but as a therapeutic vaccine for basically all of us infected atm, I don't hold much hope. I think Halford if he can produce will be a great thing for partners of HSV carriers. 

Edited by tom343
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been recent studies from other scientists that have shown positive effects of live attenuated viruses for therapeutic purposes. Seriously just look on Google Scholar. 

Halford's vaccine WILL have some form of Therapeutic effect, this is anyone's guess, It could be 10% or it could be 90% reduction in symptoms and shedding, honestly people jump to conclusions WAYYYYYYYYYY before any quantifiable research has been done. All I do know is that there is a small precedent there already with other people who have found therapeutic effects from live attenuated viruses in people already infected with that virus strain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people take time and read his blog he explains why he believes his vaccine has a chance to work therapeutically i.e. Pictures of guinea pigs with or without outbreaks. Fluorescent pics of antibody response in animal models. Explanations of huge amount of humoral response. Its at the very least worth testing. Meh my ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone on here hopes it will do that but it's miles behind atm on the therapeutic side compared to a genocea or admedus who are in actual ppl trials. But these therapeutic vaccines are not preventative and obviously Halford if successful can thus eliminate herpes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, Halford seems legit. But his work is not going to bear fruit anytime soon. 10 years? 20 years? These amounts of times, and none of us will be that young. It will be too late by then, for it to save our lives. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Herbfresh said:

Yup, Halford seems legit. But his work is not going to bear fruit anytime soon. 10 years? 20 years? These amounts of times, and none of us will be that young. It will be too late by then, for it to save our lives. 

It will be sooner than you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Donate

    If Honeycomb has helped you, please help us by making a donation so we can provide you with even better features and services.

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      72.1k
    • Total Posts
      486.1k
  • Posts

    • WilsoInAus
      I really suggest that the best thing is for both you and your boyfriend to obtain the Westernblot HSV test. He has a 50%+ chance of being positive and you have a 50%+ chance of being negative. Only the Westernblot can sort this out for you.
    • WilsoInAus
      Hi @kpn the first thing to note is that it is all OK to have HSV-1 or indeed any HSV type. It is not negligence, it is just being human. Oral HSV-1 is not an STD in the sense that the primary transmission is non sexual and the majority of it occurs between parents to children. If any of your children contracted HSV, you would know it. It wouldn't be a silent infection for children. HSV-2 tends not to shed from the oral region for people who have it there in any event. At age 73, about 80% of the population has HSV-1. There is no reason to believe that your mother isn't one of those people. About half of all carriers of oral HSV-1 do not realise they have it and have no living memory of cold sores as they were infected when very young. The most logical explanation is that your mother has oral HSV-1 from her childhood and that your daughter doesn't have oral HSV. Not that it is relevant to anyone but yourself, but your wife might find she actually has genital HSV-1 having had an untyped swab when she was diagnosed.
    • WilsoInAus
      Hi @Dylan86 and welcome to the website. First note that you cannot pragmatically become infected with HSV-1 from sharing a drink. If you carry HSV-1, it did not come from that episode. As such it is extremely unlikely HSV-1 is the primary cause of your issues. Can the WB miss a HSV-1 infection? Rarely but its feasible in less than 1% of carriers who test with WB. Note that the WB does not have values, it has positive or negative as you say. It is way more accurate than IgG as it looks for all 30+ antibodies that are in your blood for HSV. Could you have HSV-1? Yes it is feasible, but it would be a very old childhood infection. Could HSV-1 be causing your oral issues? No herpes will not cause the burning mouth syndrome you describe. Could some of the lesions be herpes related? It is feasible if you are a carrier. But it is unlikely to be the primary cause of the issues, but its an opportunistic virus that can cause issues when something else is taxing your immune system. The best thing you can do is the PCR test on a oral lesion and that will be pretty definitive. Either way, in summary. I'd suggest there is <1% chance you are part of about 70% of the population that has HSV-1. Further there is less than a 1% chance that herpes is the primary cause of your issues.   
    • kpn
      My wife has had hsv 2 for around 8 years. We have two young children 3 years old and 18 months old. My wife only had one outbreak when she was first infected so we didn't worry too much about passing it on to our children. I understand the risk to be pretty low under those circumstances. I don't believe my wife took antivirals during either pregnancy. My younger child has diaper rashes pretty often and has had what I thought was hand foot and mouth disease. That was going around the daycare a while back. I haven't really given it much concern though.  About a week ago, my mother kissed my youngest on the lips. My kid was congested at the time but they pretty much always are. About 3 days later, my mother developed a cold sore on her mouth. She has never had cold sores in her life and she is 73 and happily married so she is not going around messing with anyone. She pointed to the fact she had kissed my youngest and presumed that is where she was infected. At first I said that's not possible since my child has never had any cold sores but since then I have really started to consider that maybe it is possible she contracted it from my daughter. This has me worried that my daughter does indeed have hsv2 and was shedding in her mouth. Does anyone have any experience with this? I am really losing sleep about this. Two people I care so much about got hsv from my negligence. I am fine if I were to contract it, I am not worried about what others think at this point in my life. I just don't want anyone else to have it. 
    • CHT
      Hello DavidGua.... based on the two pictures, I'm not seeing anything that resembles a typical herpes outbreak.  I am not sure what those spots are on your penis.  Please have a doctor take a look and I'm sure you'll get a proper diagnosis.  Have you ever received an HSV antibody test (IgG)?  Again, I doubt your symptoms are herpes-related but, if you'd like some peace of mind, you could request the IgG antibody test for HSV2.   Best of luck.... let us know if you have any other questions/concerns.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.