Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
cryptkeeper

Question regarding blood test

Recommended Posts

cryptkeeper

My pcr swab came back positive for hsv 2. I'm just itching to know if this is a recent infection as I've had similar symptoms about a year ago but chalked them up as allergic rashes. 

Will an Elisa blood test from labcorp tell me that? I know a false positive is generally anything below 3.5 but if I had higher than that would this prove my theory that I've had this longer than just recently?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Free73

No it won't tell you that. The number is largely irrelevant as far as determining whether it's recent or not. Generally, if an IGG test is positive, then all it means is that you have probably had the virus for at least 3 months or longer.

If the lesions or rash were in the same spot, looked similar and you subsequently tested positive via swab, then you can be pretty sure those symptoms were herpes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cryptkeeper
15 minutes ago, Free73 said:

No it won't tell you that. The number is largely irrelevant as far as determining whether it's recent or not. Generally, if an IGG test is positive, then all it means is that you have probably had the virus for at least 3 months or longer.

If the lesions or rash were in the same spot, looked similar and you subsequently tested positive via swab, then you can be pretty sure those symptoms were herpes.

They were in a few different spots all in the "boxer shorts" area but looked basically the same as the recent one. I don't really wanna waste the money if it's pretty clear that's what they were. It'll also give me peace of mind that my body has at least fought this for about a year to decrease shedding slightly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Free73

Honestly, I think its a waste of money. Once you get a reliable diagnosis, wanting to then establish when you may have got it is a waste of time, money and energy.

Your primary (or first outbreak) is generally accompanied by flu like symptoms and you can generally feel pretty sick. So if this outbreak was mild, then it's probably a recurrence and you were infected some time ago.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cryptkeeper
17 minutes ago, Free73 said:

Honestly, I think its a waste of money. Once you get a reliable diagnosis, wanting to then establish when you may have got it is a waste of time, money and energy.

Your primary (or first outbreak) is generally accompanied by flu like symptoms and you can generally feel pretty sick. So if this outbreak was mild, then it's probably a recurrence and you were infected some time ago.

 

Yeah no flu or sick symptoms at all, and cleared up fairly quick. Thanks for your response. I guess I just needed someone to validate my own assumptions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,571
    • Total Posts
      468,650
  • Posts

    • Abdul malik
      I'm in ny and 39 inshallah Allah u still check for this
    • WilsoInAus
      That's exactly right, you can return to your life and get the blood test as a sleep easy in 12 weeks time (from the last episode).
    • Laurenhelena
      Him and his ex have regular breakouts with all the traditional symptoms and I believe he was swabbed.  So I can return to life as it was before all of this drama ? I may still look into a blood test is I am confident it is accurate 
    • WilsoInAus
      @Laurenhelena how is this guy sure he has herpes? All sounding a bit odd to me. Yes it is very unlikely you will develop lesions now. Rubbing skin to skin is required for any feasible transmission chance. The odds of transmission with unprotected vaginal sex are of the order of 0.08% per epsiode. Halve this if a condom is worn. Compare that to chamydia that has about a 33% chance of transmission with unprotected sex; now that's contagious!
    • Laurenhelena
      I just feel that it’s known as such a contagious STD - I’ve been lying to my family cause when I tried to talk about it they became very anxious and begged me to tell them I hadn’t slept with him when I had - If someone told me that they slept with someone with genital herpes my mind would instantly think they had it.  So it’s unlikely then that I’m going to get symptoms now? I’m not going anything further with that guy but we have cuddled and kissed in bed with underwear on, is that ok?  Im quite sure he has hsv2 given that his ex gave it to him through a threesome  I’ve never had a cold sore   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.