Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Skye249

Doc said asymptomatic shedding more likely in asymptomatic people

Recommended Posts

Skye249

A doctor speaking at the Herpes Viruses Association (HVA) conference I went to in February said that asymptomatic shedding is twice as likely to happen as outbreaks and that people who've never had an outbreak may asymptomatically shed the virus more than people who are symptomatic. He said this was because people who have outbreaks deal with the virus this way, while in asymptomatic people, their bodies are more likely to deal with the virus by shedding it without symptoms. 

Everything I read prior to the conference stated the opposite - that people who have outbreaks shed more asymptomatically. 

Are there two schools of thought on this?

And what does this mean for people who have outbreaks for the first few years after contracting the virus and then stop having them? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hopingforthebest08

@Skye249 I've read both. I think what it comes down to is nothing is definitive with this virus. It just depends on the individual. If you are + the best you can do is manage your outbreaks, disclose, use protection, and perhaps suppressive therapy. And hope for a cure/vaccine in the near future. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skye249

Thanks hopingforthebest08. I think you are right. 

It just makes me think this is another reason to encourage testing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Disc0rdant

Yup.  The answer is:

 

We doctors are clueless.  No ryhme or reason.  Might be a slightly dif strain, poorer immune system or a bunch of dif reasons mixed....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skye249

Can you please elaborate @SupermansJustice

Edited by Skye249
To add @

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Atrapasueños

Los médicos se quedaron con los libros  y el concepto de los 80 y 90 ni siquiera saben diagnosticar al 100% el hsv menos van a saber de lesiones y arrojar 

Esta la creencia de que si no hay brote no hay contagió

La creencia de que es sólo un problema de la piel

La creencia de que el medicamento de supresión es 100% eficaz

La creencia de que puedes llevar una vida normal sin que te afecte físicamente y emocionalmente ya que para ellos sólo es un problema de la piel y que si no tienes lesiones no derramas 

En mi opinión los asintomáticos controlan un poco más la replicación del hsv pero eso no existen lesiones pero eso no evita que se escapen alguna partículas virales y se expongan en la piel

 

The doctors kept the books and the concept of the 80s and 90s do not even know to diagnose 100% the hsv less will know of injuries and throw

This is the belief that if there is no outbreak there is no contagion

The belief that it is just a skin problem

The belief that the suppression drug is 100% effective

The belief that you can lead a normal life without affecting you physically and emotionally because for them is only a problem of the skin and if you do not have injuries do not spill

In my opinion the asymptomatic control a little more the replication of the hsv but that there are no injuries but that does not prevent that they escape some viral particles and expose themselves in the skin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nightmare7575

The woman I got it from had her first outbreak two weeks later ,so I thought I was in the clear,but she must have been shedding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,741
    • Total Posts
      470,272
  • Posts

    • BioHacker
      Meds and condoms is really all you need. Statistically, HSV2 is so widespread because 80-90% of  people who have it are unaware that they have it, and so they don't take all recommended precautions (including using condoms). Oddly enough, if you were to replace your HSV2+ girlfriend (aware of HSV status, using condoms, using suppressive meds) with the average American woman (unaware of HSV status, but 25% risk, which is average - and using condoms at all times, since presumably you could insist on it), you would actually NOT reduce your risk of HSV2. The statistical risk would be approximately the same for both theoretical girlfriends (about 0.7% per year assuming sex 2x per week). That is a bit simplistic, because maybe you could decide to date only women who are verified virgins (essentially no risk), or maybe "below average risk" in some way (younger than average, fewer prior partners than average, etc.), or you could have all prospective girlfriends IgG blood tested for HSV as a condition to dating them (or having sex with them), which would reduce the risk significantly (especially if you confirmed the paperwork), but not completely (since antibodies take some time to develop). At some point, beyond-standard precautions become inconvenient and not worth the hassle (or risk of being perceived as paranoid). The risk isn't zero, and probably would never be zero, short of taking extreme measures. Efforts to reduce risk beyond standard practices, which already reduce risk to relatively low levels, are naturally subject to the law of diminishing returns. Accepting some level of risk is (unfortunately) part of the deal in most reasonable endeavors. Also, there is statistically a greater likelihood of two people passing HPV between them one way or the other, than HSV2 (assuming all recommended precautions are being taken). Of course, you could get the HPV vaccine (everyone should!). But the vaccine only covers 10-15% of the types of HPV that are out there. And tests for HPV are imperfect, and generally not available for males. And HPV (some types) can cause cancer (cervical, penile, and throat - maybe others). So, keep that in mind as well. And then, of course, there are all the other risks . . . Best not to be paranoid though . . .
    • WilsoInAus
      That’s correct. HIV is a distinct virus. No virus morphs into another one.
    • WilsoInAus
      Hey @thebrightsidegirl I hope you’re going ok, I’ve read your posts and will see if I can draw some threads. I see that you have genital HSV-1 and your partner has oral HSV-1. I’m not sure if he has tested but given it’s somcommon there’s no reason to disbelieve that’s what he has. This is the best concirdant scenario you can hope for in a sexual relationship. You both already have the virus and your immune systems are established and your experience with herpes is your own. You cannot induce an outbreak in each other by virtue your own HSV-1 and transmission to a new location on your partner is too small to worry about. If HSV-2 is present, then it needs to be brought to the relationship. It’s not at all likely you have it given you were infected genitally with HSV-1.  I suggest these symptoms are very unlikely to be related to herpes at all. If they are, then it’s far more likely to be a recurrent outbreak issue with your HSV-1 as opposed to an initial infection with HSV-2. 
    • hopeing
      Ozone is basically toxic to humans at high levels. Its probably as likely to kill your cells as the virus. Add to that the virus is not in the blood and I'd say this 'treatment' is probably totally ineffective and if it does include high levels of real ozone likely dangerous. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_therapy
    • thebrightsidegirl
      Hey Wilson , do you kids answering this , i was kind of worried too ? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.