Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Seaturtle3

Quick question

Recommended Posts

Seaturtle3

How long after your first ob and starting antivirals is it safe to have sex?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

When your sores have healed completely and you've been on antivirals for about a week.

Note that if your partner has the same type as you then you technically cannot pass it back and forth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sanguine108
14 hours ago, WilsoInAus said:

Note that if your partner has the same type as you then you technically cannot pass it back and forth.

just save yourself the embarrassment of saying things like this that have been proven otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whyyyyy
8 minutes ago, Sanguine108 said:

just save yourself the embarrassment of saying things like this that have been proven otherwise.

If you both have hsv2 genitally you can't pass it back and forth. Same, if you both have oral hsv1 you can't pass it back and forth...probably not a good idea to have sex or anything with sores still (who would want to?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sanguine108

It'd be nice if it were that cut and dry but there's a study that shows otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Miha
Quote

It'd be nice if it were that cut and dry but there's a study that shows otherwise.

Like what, can you clarify it a bit. Do you mean infecting other body parts other than the initial site of infection? Like if you touch a sore and then touch your eye etc?

 

Or do you mean slightly different strains of the virus? Like they describe in this research:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2238078/#!po=35.0000

Edited by Miha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seaturtle3

Thank you guys, I had ghsv2... It's been two weeks sense I started suppressive therapy... I guess I'm just kinda scared... But again thank you this was helpful! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sanguine108

well, yes and it depends.   Yes to infected w different sub-strains.  https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-04-viruses-reveal-history.html

Not trying to instill any frustration but just because someone else has the same 'type' of HSV doesn't make them an automatic match for promiscuous sex.  Love them and want to be with them, regardless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus
8 hours ago, Sanguine108 said:

It'd be nice if it were that cut and dry but there's a study that shows otherwise.

What study?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sanguine108
On 6/14/2017 at 6:30 PM, WilsoInAus said:

What study?

The first sentence of the article.

"The genomes of two distinct strains of the virus that causes the common lip cold sore, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), have been identified within an individual person...    

The research by an international team led by Moriah L. Szpara, assistant professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at Penn State University, will be published in the May 2016 issue of the journal Virology."

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-04-viruses-reveal-history.html#jCp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

Yes many people do, but the evidence collectively suggests that infection with both or more strains occurs at the same time or a small period of time maybe. Once established there is no evidence you can be infected with another so termed strain.

The point stands. If you have an established infection then the chances of a further infection with the same type, different strain or not, is negligible to zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

What you have provided is an opinion article, it isn't a source. A guy who has come back from the brothels of Korea with two strains of HSV-1 doesn't even warrant consideration as even remotely possibly  

There are no sources as it is not known to happen with sufficient frequency to even be able to study. The proposition therefore holds that autoinnoculation or similar such as infection with a different strain is therefore negligible to zero.

The only studies that I am aware of pertain to the topic of children presenting to a doctor with genital herpes, which happens more than anyone would wish to think. Doctors are required to report such findings to child protection authorities in most countries. Hence there are many available cases internationally. These cases of course need to be investigated as to cause. You'd think that if autoinnoculation were feasible that there would be some that have a case conclusion that infection from an established oral infection has occurred.

On how many occasions has this occurred, the world over?

Not one.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sanguine108
2 hours ago, WilsoInAus said:

What you have provided is an opinion article, it isn't a source.

So science journalism that's based off of peer-reviewed research is just an opinion?  Your posts are more opinion based.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

Yes the article is peer reviewed. Did you read it, of course not. If you did you would know:

- the article makes no assertion that the strains were acquired separately

- acknowledges that the samples and testing was undertaken in the 1960s and the records are incomplete and could be mixed up.

That's not opinion.

Again it stands, the chance of being infected with the same type (same or different strain) once you have an established infection is negligible to zero. 

No amount of light or heavy skimming of the internet and busted arse interpretations on your part is going to change this fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sanguine108
24 minutes ago, WilsoInAus said:

Again it stands, the chance of being infected with the same type (same or different strain) once you have an established infection is negligible to zero. 

that is your baseless opinion.  I understand you'd like things to be black and white but they're not.  You want to believe that nature/evolution has produced ONLY two recognizable combinations for HSV1 and HSV2.  All these diagnostic tests are only looking for conserved regions within HSV1 or 2, nothing about their expressed phenotype, nothing about the surface protein/antigen composition. The immune system makes antibodies depending on what it's exposed to and while it may make antibodies, essentially changing the lock for one type of pathogen, a similar pathogen with a different key composition/configuration could/would slip by.

I've heard a person talk about how they had oral HSV-1 for 10 years, had an outbreak, went to the bathroom (in the am), touched his sore, touch his penis and then started breaking downstairs.  And this came up because some shlomo, know-it-all was proclaiming that once you get oral HSV-1, you don't have to worry about spreading it elsewhere.

You'll probably argue that these are "anecdotal" and insignificant but whatever man.   People can do their research and figure it out.  But this is about not figuring it out the hard way.  Ignorance may be bliss but not when suffering is involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Disc0rdant

Yes.  There are no studies either way.  People write opinions based on what they think.  The Greeks called it "herpes" for a reason.  The word literally means "to creep".  The Greeks were very intelligent, knowledgable folks.  I trust them over some of the self proclaimed prophets...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

Which  thread are you reading?

Are you inferring that "the chance of being infected with the same type (same or different strain) once you have an established infection is negligible to zero" is a baseless opinion.

It has nothing to do with opinion. It is observed fact - pure and simple.

The antibodies are effective against all strains. Is there a reason to believe otherwise? Well no as once again we have not observed infection with different types or the same strain in a different location to any discernible degree. Can it happen, of course. But we know it is close to a zero chance. This is fact.

And yes there are a lot of stories here and everywhere. Oh look here's one about Elvis, that's exciting, do you think he'll have another Hawaiian comeback concert?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2620692/elvis-presley-king-spotted-graceland-conspiracy-theory-he-lives/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus
8 minutes ago, Disc0rdant said:

Yes.  There are no studies either way.  People write opinions based on what they think.  The Greeks called it "herpes" for a reason.  The word literally means "to creep".  The Greeks were very intelligent, knowledgable folks.  I trust them over some of the self proclaimed prophets...

How silly, yes to creep within the skin, not to spread to different locations. 

So you trust them that the world is flat?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1aday

Interesting... I guess here's the reference study

http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0042682216300083/1-s2.0-S0042682216300083-main.pdf?_tid=76ee794c-5659-11e7-b435-00000aacb35d&acdnat=1498032970_0b52d84110b6feeff5b5ccd6de4a7e01 

As for the OP's question -- after your sores heal completely AND you don't feel prodrome.  It depends on the circumstance really, like, are you trying to protect your partner who is non-H?  From experience, my ex and I had sex as long as there's no visible outbreaks regardless of prodrome.  I mean.. I got it from him and we couldn't help ourselves.  

Edited by 1aday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,761
    • Total Posts
      470,435
  • Posts

    • TerribleAtUserNames
      Hi there,  Long time lurker, first time poster, and I'll keep it simple and condensed.  I've only signed up because I realize the depths of suffering some people are in, trying all sorts of desperate treatments, and I've basically been sitting on something that has taken me to near 0 outbreaks (hsv1 genital). When I first got infected some years back, I had an atypical presentation--no pain or itching, but permanently there. Bumps going up and down within the same day even, but pretty much permanently covering the head of my penis. Doctor swabbed it--came back hsv 1; he said it looked like it to him too.  Now to the meat of it--rubbing alcohol. Its simple, and I'm pretty surprised that I've only seen it mentioned once here--a woman was talking about it, so I assume it works for girls too. I apply once daily, to once every 3 days, and that keeps me pretty much permanently outbreak free.  It quite literally went from every day broken out for me to just about nothing. Anyway, to the what and where of it all...    I use 99% isopropyl. 70% seems good too. I now have a spray bottle, but used to just dump it on the head and roll my foreskin up over it for like 20ish seconds--whatever process is actually happening, I like to think I'm facilitating absorption into the soft tissue by doing this and wreaking havoc on the virus. Obviously, you may have to do it a bit differently, genital depending. I've been doing this treatment for a few years now, so it has staying power. I read once that herpes is shreded by alcohol, so if true, I guess that explains it? However, iterupting regular treatment seems to have anecdotally, but not with great surety, made the herpes a bit less suceptible to the alcohol upon resumption.  Yes, it burns terribly at first. Over time it gets better. Some days it still really burns, and in those cases I advise listening to your body and cutting the countdown short. Other than that, it feels really damn good to basically tell herpes to eff off.  I don't know what kind of health risks there are. Or whether using a high % grain (drinking) alcohol would work / be healthier. I advise asking your doctor--afterall, alchohol is implicated in throat cancer. Who knows if 20-30 seconds daily on your junk can do something too.  But for those who struggle constantly, I truly hope this can help someone other than just me.    I also hope that this finds its way to the right forum. I wanted it in a place where casual, straight from Google, viewers would see it when they came here, and I'm hoping--and asking, please--that if I didn't get it in the right place, a moderator can instead. And, should it help as I suggest, perhaps even stickying it one day.  I'm sorry in advance, I'm not a big forum person and don't come here crazy often. It just felt like something I should do for everyone else's sake. Hopefully you can excuse me if I'm an absentee topic starter.  Thanks for reading, - Taylor
    • WilsoInAus
      Hey @Jazz923 they don’t look like herpes lesions, more like pearly papules that some guys get.  I’d suggest these are independent of your herpes status. The question of your herpes status will depend on the test that you had. What test suggested you had HSV-2? Was it a blood test?
    • Jazz923
      I recently seen these bumps on my penis didn’t hurt or itch only broke because I was masturbating (dumb move) this cleared up in week I got test and said it was hsv 2 but my gf got tested and had nothing I didn’t experience the things I seen on google and I didn’t take the medicine cause it has the virus in it I just need a bit more clarification like any kind of test or anything helps     https://ibb.co/pRm0VbJ
    • Sarah889
      So I guess I'm just on here for a bit of a rant, as today I woke up with my second outbreak in a month! My initial one was only at the end of April, and even after investing in a load of vitamins, lysine etc I'm in this situation again. I was hoping I'd be one of those who never gets another outbreak, but apparently not.  I think the problem is, I really liked my life before all of this crap, and I don't really want to have to change anything. Going to the gym is amazing for my mental health, and i normally go around 4 times a week. I also love a bit of chocolate every day (but I eat super healthy for the majority of the day) and being a uni student, I'm partial to a few cocktails and late nights every month as well. This is my time to socialise with my friends and have some fun. At 21 you really don't want to be taking your life too seriously.  Does anyone else just feel annoyed about having to switch up a happy life that they enjoy? I understand there's a lot of people who had unhealthy lifestyles before their diagnosis, that went on to lose weight which is great! But I'm already slim and active, and I eat freshly cooked food every day with lots of fruit and veggies.  I'm starting to believe that the only way to avoid an outbreak is to sit in my flat eating salads all day and have no contact with anyone else (in case of stress). Like I legit feel like I need to wrap myself up in cotton wool and just not allow myself to have a life at all. I'm so frustrated that I have to stop doing the things that I love. I'm going travelling next month, and I would bet all the money that I have that I will get another outbreak, because of the plane journey, late nights and alcohol. I just want to be a normal 21 year old who gets to enjoy her life! Does anyone else feel the same? 
    • BioHacker
      The meds work the same as long as you take them every day (some are one a day, some are multiple times per day). They cost money, but there is no reason you can't take them for life. Most people would just take the meds, but if you are married for 20 years and the meds are annoying for some reason, and you don't care about it, then maybe don't bother? It's up to the two of you. Skipping the daily meds would increase the risk from 0.7% per year to 1.4% per year (assuming sex 2x per week). That changes it from a 1-in-140 year event to a 1-in-70 year event (assuming you still use condoms every time). To be honest, most married people would probably rather skip the condoms before they skip the meds. It's up to you what measures you take though.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.