Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
why4

confusing test results

Recommended Posts

why4

Was diagnosed in late June and am shocked and curious about my apparently odd results. Went to my PCP on 6/18 for yearly testing and pap and also what I thought was a tear from sex. My results came in later that week on 6/22 and I was diagnosed through a pap saying the pathologist recognized abnormal and HSV cells and everything else came back normal/negative. The same day I found out the results of the pap I had my blood drawn for both HSV 1/2 IGG and both came back completely negative. 

Two weeks later on 7/5 I went back for retesting at the same lab and test and HSV 1 came back negative and HSV 2 came back at 3.9 H. I also went back a third time 2 weeks later and HSV 1 was still negative and HSV 2 went down a little bit to 3.6 H. My doctor said this is a huge jump in such a short time and one she had never seen before.

I could have had two possible exposures. One was back in late April and it was very short and we used a condom except he took it off at the end. The second encounter was June 6th and we slept together unprotected quite a few times until the 16th.

The 3 weeks following the guy in April I had insane UTI pain and discharge but did not notice any blisters but could've easily overlooked it with the UTI pain (it was the worst pain I have ever experienced). I finally went to an urgent care after 3 weeks and it went away with antibiotics. I didn't notice anything odd after the second guy until the tear and the week I got diagnosed. The week of the 18th I felt flu-like symptoms and a few other odd symptoms such as minimal discharge and UTI pain and then I noticed 3 small blisters by the end of the week. I was also extremely stressed and not sleeping much at all so not sure if they were actually flu-like symptoms or just sleep deprivation. 

I have been told by numerous doctors that the guy from June is the most possible option as to who infected me.  Both guys said they got tested and both claim to be of course negative. 

It has been stressing me out sooo much as to who infected me and the timing and symptoms could be very possible for either. The first IGG test that came back negative would have been 8 weeks since the first guy and 2 weeks since the second guy and the high results on the second test would have been at the 10 and 4 week mark.  

Has anyone else seen or had such a large jump in just short of 2 weeks? I've read that if you're negative for HSV 1 then you can build antibodies quicker but I'm not sure how accurate that is. Or a result that high at just 4 weeks since first exposure and 2 since last exposure?

Has anyone been originally diagnosed through a pap?

Any input or help on how to move on from not knowing who infected you? I don't know why but I am so concerned over it and can't seem to move past it until I know, maybe just something to distract myself from the shock of the actual diagnosis??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quest

Ask to see paperwork. I just know that it's hard to tell by numbers. Either one could have it.

Why did they believe he was the one infected you?

I am not a big fan of searching for the infection origination. Up to you.

Phosphatydylserine will remove cortisol and help with sleep. But you may lose weight with it. Online Amazon. Also magnesium most people are short anyway.  Be good to you:squeeze:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WannaCry

Ask your Dr for a printout of your results so we can help you try to figure out what may be going on with your numbers. 

I have never heard of someone being diagnosed through a Pap. Ever. So that is a new one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why4
On 8/11/2018 at 9:14 PM, Quest said:

Ask to see paperwork. I just know that it's hard to tell by numbers. Either one could have it.

Why did they believe he was the one infected you?

I am not a big fan of searching for the infection origination. Up to you.

Phosphatydylserine will remove cortisol and help with sleep. But you may lose weight with it. Online Amazon. Also magnesium most people are short anyway.  Be good to you:squeeze:

2

Thanks for the response! 

Do you mean ask for the guys paperwork? 

My PCP said the pap results with my first test being negative make it most likely it was him and the other few doctors said it is an 80% chance that I should have been positive by the 8 week mark (my first test that came back negative). I'm also in my early twenties and was super healthy and work out daily so they said it is a better chance of a healthy immune system to react that quickly? I'm not sure, I feel like I've been told so many different things. 

And I truly wish I had that mindset.

I haven't heard of Phosphatydylserine but I am definitely going to look into it! Sleep has definitely been a huge issue since I've been diagnosed so I will try anything. 

Thank you!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why4
13 hours ago, WannaCry said:

Ask your Dr for a printout of your results so we can help you try to figure out what may be going on with your numbers. 

I have never heard of someone being diagnosed through a Pap. Ever. So that is a new one.

Thanks for your response!

My pap results are:

EPITHELIAL CELL ABNORMALITY.
ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE.
CELLULAR CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH HERPES SIMPLEX ARE PRESENT.

My PCP actually talked to the pathologist after and they said they saw the virus actually attacking my cervix (scary thought) and causing the changes so she said that means it was probably from who I most recently slept with which was 2 days prior to the pap. But that means I got such a high result at just 2-3 weeks post infection?? Which I have not read anywhere about someone having the same reaction so quickly. 

IgG results:

6/22: HSV1 - <.90 and HSV2 - <.90

7/5: HSV1 - <.90 and HSV2 - 3.94 H

7/19: HSV1 - <.90 and HSV2 - 3.68 H

I am probably most confused by the huge jump between 6/22 and 7/5. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quest

Yes, get a copy of the last guy's paperwork.  It must be an igG. He could get a swab and have it come back negative to fool you. Not that he would do that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus
5 hours ago, why4 said:

Thanks for your response!

My pap results are:

EPITHELIAL CELL ABNORMALITY.
ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS CELLS OF UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE.
CELLULAR CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH HERPES SIMPLEX ARE PRESENT.

My PCP actually talked to the pathologist after and they said they saw the virus actually attacking my cervix (scary thought) and causing the changes so she said that means it was probably from who I most recently slept with which was 2 days prior to the pap. But that means I got such a high result at just 2-3 weeks post infection?? Which I have not read anywhere about someone having the same reaction so quickly. 

IgG results:

6/22: HSV1 - <.90 and HSV2 - <.90

7/5: HSV1 - <.90 and HSV2 - 3.94 H

7/19: HSV1 - <.90 and HSV2 - 3.68 H

I am probably most confused by the huge jump between 6/22 and 7/5. 

These numbers do look feasible if you were infected say in the first 2 weeks of June. They're even feasible say for infection from the beginning of May say, but not so likely.

I would really check that first test very hard. Are you sure it is IgG and not IgM?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why4
4 hours ago, WilsoInAus said:

These numbers do look feasible if you were infected say in the first 2 weeks of June. They're even feasible say for infection from the beginning of May say, but not so likely.

I would really check that first test very hard. Are you sure it is IgG and not IgM?

So you think the encounter from April is probably least likely and it is most likely the person from June who infected me? I'm assuming I would've been at least equivocal in June if it were from April. 

Yes, they are all 3 from Quest and I believe called HerpeSelect IgG? I wish I had done the IgM at least once sometime in June because it probably would've given me a clearer answer. I was expecting to be positive on the tests done in July but wasn't expecting it to be that high and was even crazy enough to call the lab to make sure there was no mix-up but I was apparently the only one to get that test done that day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why4
4 hours ago, Quest said:

Yes, get a copy of the last guy's paperwork.  It must be an igG. He could get a swab and have it come back negative to fool you. Not that he would do that.

He said it was a blood test and that his doctor said he was "touched" by the virus but I'm not sure if he just misinterpreted his doctor and they just said he could've been exposed to it if I told him I had it and to go get tested? This obviously put a lot of strain on our relationship and just recently decided to part ways so I probably won't be able to get ahold of them, unfortunately. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

Early June for infection looks the most probable explanation. No guarantees, just a best fit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quest

Touched by HSV. Interesting. You either test positive or not. Maybe he was a low positive. Were you ever touched by pregnancy?

At least you know you are building antibodies rapidly. I have a long standing infection at 20 on IgG

 

Edited by Quest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why4
On 8/13/2018 at 9:52 PM, Quest said:

Touched by HSV. Interesting. You either test positive or not. Maybe he was a low positive. Were you ever touched by pregnancy?

At least you know you are building antibodies rapidly. I have a long standing infection at 20 on IgG

 

Yeah I'm pretty sure it's from him but I don't know why he would lie about being negative since we were still together and I said I was already positive. Maybe he was infected right before we met?

Is higher the number better? How do the antibodies work over time? Will it continually go up forever? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

The number doesn’t matter very much in terms of your experience with herpes. Your immune system has 80 elements that address HSV and your experience is related to the combined effort of these 80 elements.

I’d suggest this partner is very probably infected and has been for a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quest

No it won't go up forever, I know I have been infected for a long time. Some people in here have values in the 50s. it just gives you an idea of where those numbers can go from here. The more antibodies you have the better off you are and at least you know your immune system is building those antibodies. I hope you do really well!:two_hearts:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,304
    • Total Posts
      466,290
  • Posts

    • jmherped
      Quest, what is your protocol exactly for taking out a breakout in 24 to 48 hours?
    • jeraldpeabody
      @MikeHerp totally agree and understand! so i would say the first port of call is to somehow bring all these different voices together and work out a good way to collaborate. I've contacted some of the people on instagram / youtube that have fairly big followers but I have yet to hear back from them. I might try another tactic!  What are you thoughts on trying to have a central point of information / communication for the movement ? is it worth setting up a discord / slack kinda messaging app ? for example i can't use this forum on my phone at all, I have to be at my lappy to use it. I also appreciate what Rich does, but he has very few followers on social if you compare him to alot of the female voices on there. LaureenHD is prob the biggest herpes advocate I can find out there with a large following. I'll reach out to her again.. 
    • jmherped
      Does anybody know what an extreme dive in the chamber like the one the diver who was cured would do to a person?  Is it painful/dangerous, or do you just go in and out like nothing happened? 
    • jmherped
      This looks very promising...  I'm in Cabo and they have one of these for divers at the hospital.  I'm going to check into the cost.  John146, are you still using your home machine? 
    • MikeHerp
      Right.  I agree that goals are important. 1.  I want to continue to raise money for FHC.  I don't think it has to be that far off as you mentioned, though, as you noted, it still needs a bit of time.  I have a feeling we'll be surprised how quickly progress is made, and the FDA does not seem intent on slowing the progress this time.  Further, once human trials actually start and this stuff starts to show it's quite effective, I think things will become a bit more optimistic for the rest of us even if completing the trials still takes some time.  That's how I see it.  Of course, it's possible that it all fails, it hits huge roadblocks etc. There is that risk.  But I believe this gene editing stuff is here to stay.  Every serious analysis of futuristic technologies I've reviewed, seems to think so as well.  Also, the more important thing is what I wrote at the bottom in boldface--we can make things happen, we can change or at least bend the reality if we try.  In my view, that's more important than how far away something might seem. We've had several veterans here chime in, like @Cas9 who are older, who have dealt with this for decades even, and they aren't even sure whether they will be around when a cure or partial cure gets rolled out (I think Cas9 will get it in his life though), but they still urge us not to give up hope, that there's more momentum now than there used to be.  That's more important than the notion that something might still take some time.   2.  We can get behind other research efforts / trials.  As somebody else mentioned, once pritelivir completes its phase 2, we can begin writing to the FDA to have it approved, to allow it to be tested in not immunocompromised patients.  That kind of grass roots movement will be easier if it is concentrated, coordinated. 3.  We may consider looking at other fund raisers.  Other things may emerge and there are people who are working on herpes stuff (like Doctor Iwasaki) who need money.  But at this time. I don't want to get side tracked.  Ive also been carefully watching Rich Mancuso's efforts regarding theravax.  My only issue with it is that his petitions are asking the FDA to fast track Therevax. But the vaccine hasn't even been submitted to the FDA for testing, so it doesn't seem like it makes much sense to petition the FDA to fast rack it now.  As far as I know, the FDA can't fast-track something that hasn't even entered the process.  But, Thiel has invested close to $10 million in it, and if it does get into human trials, we could consider joining forces with Rich to highlight that and maybe write appropriate letters to the FDA.   4.  As you mentioned, raising awareness. Across various platforms and across various geographical regions.   Hopefully also converting more people to our cause.  For example, @hsv2fighter mentioned to me that he is trying to put together an association of Chinese HSV patients.  I imagine there must be millions.  And with ppl in China being increasingly connected to the internet, I think there could be many with whom we can unite. Likewise, that kind of channel could give us a better view on what they are doing in China with gene editing etc.   5.  As you mentioned, unifying people to show how large and important the movement is, and the need for more funding and research etc. 6.  I believe relevant additional goals will emerge on which we can act, and if we have unified, it will be easier to act.  Most of the time, even if somebody has some good idea to do something, not a lot can be done because people aren't coordinated.  Somebody creates a petition, and maybe 5 people sign it.  Look, the whole FHC fund raiser didn't exist 2 months ago, but came into existence because I reached out to FHC and they were responsive to and supportive of the idea.  So that was good.  But that alone might not have accomplished much if the good folks at Honeycomb, hadn't not only pinned the post about the fund raiser, but also given it their informal seal of approval.  And now, because of all that, we've raised over $10k, and that's only based on mainly small donations in a few weeks from our community.  We haven't even really targeted any deep pockets (we've barely tried) or done a lot to sell the case, rather, we've mainly just donated ourselves. All that stuff happened because people worked together.   The point is that, we can make things happen, bigger things, if we try.  That's what I'd like to focus on more than the idea that something might be far away or it's hard to do something.   Anyway, thanks for your efforts.  This stuff is easier when others are also contributing and you are helping a lot.        
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.