Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
friendlyboy

My small informal trial re Zn(O2COOH3)2

Recommended Posts

friendlyboy

Background:

I've been infected since Feb 2017, symptomatic since May 2017, on suppressive treatment ever since, suffering from extremely frequent symptoms (OBs), as frequent as daily or bi-daily even with suppressive treatment.

Symptoms are the usual pimple-like or folliculitis-like lesions on both inner thighs and occasionally other places from buttocks to knees, which under suppressive treatment usually don't fully develop into blistering lesions.

I've been using Zinc Acetate in several ways ever since first symptoms appeared, inconsistently, firstly as an oral supplement which didn't seem to have any effect, later as a topical application which I wasn't convinced it was of much use though it seemed somewhat beneficial.

As my current stash of Zn(O2COOH3)2 solution was getting close to depletion, I was pondering whether it was worth the effort of preparing more and keep using it.

Since earlier this year I had an unusual 2 month symptom free period, and I think I was consistently topically applying zinc acetate, I decided to run a controlled, as much as I could, experiment to see whether it had any measurable effect or not, actually expecting it not to have any effect.

The trial:

Open-label, no placebo control, crossover trial of topical application of 3% zinc acetate solution on the inner thigh of one leg for one month and no treatment of the other leg under suppressive treatment 250 mg valacyclovir each 8 h, lasting 2 months. Expected result is no difference between treated and untreated.

The experiment would have been better controlled with blinding and a placebo, but zinc acetate solution has a distinct smell so it is not possible to hide which bottle has the solution unless you use another similar smelly acetate salt (such as sodium acetate), which I didn't have available and didn't want to bother looking for it just for this test. I also would have needed a friend to help me prepare the bottles so I wouldn't know which one is which.

Treatment protocol: apply with the hand 2-3 drops of solution on the skin in the area usually affected by lesions rubbing until almost dry, once daily before going to bed or just after showering.

Observed results: around 9-12 lesions were observed daily on the untreated leg after 5-7 days of stopping treatment on that leg, no lesions were observed in the treated area on the opposite leg for the entire month, 1-2 lesions appeared on the treated leg outside the treated area, lesions took around 7 days to disappear after starting treatment on the untreated leg. The same pattern repeated after switching legs.

Observed side effects: very slight erithema after application lasting less than an hour. Slight itching shortly after application on active lesions, lasting around an hour.

Conclusion: treatment seems to have an influence on preventing the appearance of lesions in this particular case. This influence may be marginal and not strong enough to make a difference in other cases.

Possible mechanisms I hypothesize for this effect are:

- Zn2+ ions crossing the skin improve immune response, perhaps by providing micro-nutrients in-place for immune cell replication.

- Zinc acetate draws immune cells closer to the epidermis somehow, perhaps by being slightly irritant, therefore improving immune response on skin viral infection.

- Rubbing the skin increases blood flow through the dermis, allowing more immune cells to reach the skin resulting on increased infiltration upon detection of viral infection.

Edited by friendlyboy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quest

Zinc lactate is supposed to be most effective on HSV 2  92%?  Has to be ordered from a chemical company.

Zinc gluconate works best for hsv1.

DontJuan had a thread on this. I think it was a zinc sulfate thread. It was really interesting to me and I do use it off and on. I was going to order the zinc lactate which is harder to mix in water, but I'm not sure I really need it anymore with my protocol.

Thanks for the information!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phoenixx

I remember you were very critical about topical treatments. I like the scientific approach.

Do you think that treatment is also ok on penis mucosa or too harsh? Where did you get the zinc acetate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
friendlyboy
8 hours ago, Phoenixx said:

I remember you were very critical about topical treatments. I like the scientific approach.

Do you think that treatment is also ok on penis mucosa or too harsh? Where did you get the zinc acetate?

 I got the zinc acetate from an pharmacy in my town, they can't sell reagents but I know the pharmacist. I cost me about 10 € a 50 gr bottle, enough for a decade at the current rate of consumtion. Otherwise it is quite easy to get, you can buy it from a laboratory or even in ebay.

I apply the treatment on my glans about 2-3 times a week, I've never had any problem or adverse effect so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VladimirM
On 9/17/2018 at 8:39 PM, friendlyboy said:

Background:

I've been infected since Feb 2017, symptomatic since May 2017, on suppressive treatment ever since, suffering from extremely frequent symptoms (OBs), as frequent as daily or bi-daily even with suppressive treatment.

Symptoms are the usual pimple-like or folliculitis-like lesions on both inner thighs and occasionally other places from buttocks to knees, which under suppressive treatment usually don't fully develop into blistering lesions.

I've been using Zinc Acetate in several ways ever since first symptoms appeared, inconsistently, firstly as an oral supplement which didn't seem to have any effect, later as a topical application which I wasn't convinced it was of much use though it seemed somewhat beneficial.

As my current stash of Zn(O2COOH3)2 solution was getting close to depletion, I was pondering whether it was worth the effort of preparing more and keep using it.

Since earlier this year I had an unusual 2 month symptom free period, and I think I was consistently topically applying zinc acetate, I decided to run a controlled, as much as I could, experiment to see whether it had any measurable effect or not, actually expecting it not to have any effect.

The trial:

Open-label, no placebo control, crossover trial of topical application of 3% zinc acetate solution on the inner thigh of one leg for one month and no treatment of the other leg under suppressive treatment 250 mg valacyclovir each 8 h, lasting 2 months. Expected result is no difference between treated and untreated.

The experiment would have been better controlled with blinding and a placebo, but zinc acetate solution has a distinct smell so it is not possible to hide which bottle has the solution unless you use another similar smelly acetate salt (such as sodium acetate), which I didn't have available and didn't want to bother looking for it just for this test. I also would have needed a friend to help me prepare the bottles so I wouldn't know which one is which.

Treatment protocol: apply with the hand 2-3 drops of solution on the skin in the area usually affected by lesions rubbing until almost dry, once daily before going to bed or just after showering.

Observed results: around 9-12 lesions were observed daily on the untreated leg after 5-7 days of stopping treatment on that leg, no lesions were observed in the treated area on the opposite leg for the entire month, 1-2 lesions appeared on the treated leg outside the treated area, lesions took around 7 days to disappear after starting treatment on the untreated leg. The same pattern repeated after switching legs.

Observed side effects: very slight erithema after application lasting less than an hour. Slight itching shortly after application on active lesions, lasting around an hour.

Conclusion: treatment seems to have an influence on preventing the appearance of lesions in this particular case. This influence may be marginal and not strong enough to make a difference in other cases.

Possible mechanisms I hypothesize for this effect are:

- Zn2+ ions crossing the skin improve immune response, perhaps by providing micro-nutrients in-place for immune cell replication.

- Zinc acetate draws immune cells closer to the epidermis somehow, perhaps by being slightly irritant, therefore improving immune response on skin viral infection.

- Rubbing the skin increases blood flow through the dermis, allowing more immune cells to reach the skin resulting on increased infiltration upon detection of viral infection.

I want to recommend you SADBE 1%. He.. it....helped me a lot. Just put it on your body a few times a day. You will see the results and feel it after the first day. 

I bouth it here.  

https://www.enbipharma.com/sadbe-forte

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ill47

I've seen a bunch of positive studies in the effects of zinc on herpes, but I don't see any products that have resulted from this. Any reasons why? Why aren't more people talking about this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Advertisement

Try a Lysine supplement for cold sores

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      68,371
    • Total Posts
      456,521
  • Posts

    • Bhbr2018
      Hey Carrie, firstly sorry you’re going through this. I  want to tell you my story and then you can draw your own conclusions. day 1: sex day 3/4: horrible fatigue, headache, and feeling unwell day 6: woke up in middle of night wired. Felt bumps down there. Knew I had herpes. Just knew.  Day 10-24: horrific outbreak 25+ sores, suicidal unable to function.  On day 7 I had swab and blood test. Was shocked when It came back positive for Ghsv1 because it was a quicky with no oral. Negative blood test, positive swab. Now I was ALWAYS tested for HSV prior to this so luckily I didn’t have to wonder.  the guy who gave it to me got tested and was positive for HSV1. Never mentioned it to me, told me, or even showed me his results. Scum. I would say the only way you can be 100 % sure is to get a swab AND and blood test igg. If the swab is positive and blood test negative highly likely YES Michael gave you herpes. You should see his results with your own eyes. Don’t let him make you feel like shit as he’s the douche who prob.put you in this situation. 
    • Celinaxox
      yeah either I'm unlucky or it's the fact that it's the first year and it's going to take some more time for my antibodies to  build up gosh their lazy
    • bigfella01
      P.S...The reason that I think that Biotron may have left the herpes viruses off their website this time is because living in Australia I contacted Admedus when they announced their HSV 2 vaccine trials to see if I could get on and the lady there told me that they had been "overwhelmed" and "surprised" at just how many people had been contacting the company in regards to the trials and with questions about the vaccine. Having done some more reading about Biotrons BIT225 it does seem impressive at this stage.  
    • blurneworder
      Any updates?
    • chinga
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.