Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
Dusty321

What do others think?

Recommended Posts

Dusty321

I have had a monogamous relationship for the last 6 years.  I did not have Herpes before the relationship.  My partner recently had an outbreak on the buttocks and was diagnosed with HSV2 about 2 months ago.  She said it was the first outbreak She had ever had.

She has been taking valacyclovir for the last 2 months and we were intimate for the first time in about 4 months about a week ago.  Now I have an outbreak on my upper lip.  I read that this is not impossible, but rare.

I wanted to ask others opinions on how HSV2 works, as I cannot help but find the situation really strange.  I totally understand that HSV2 can lie dormant for years, displaying no symptoms.  My partner says She has not been unfaithful, and I decided to believe her.  However, with this outbreak, a new doubt crept in, as I think it's really odd I would get an outbreak a week after being intimate, knowing I didn't have this before our relationship.

I would appreciate hearing if this is possible, I love my partner and can't bear the doubt, but also don't want to feel I might be being blind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

I think the most important point to note is that the unexpected presence of herpes is not evidence of infidelity. There are just too many feasible alternatives and explanations that do not involve infidelity for it to feature highly in your thinking.

I can also suggest that a herpes lesion on the butt cheek is almost always a recurrent outbreak in a person who has had the virus quite some time, potentially decades!

There could be some guesswork going here as well so let's get a few more facts in the table. 

How was your wife's lesion diagnosed as HSV-2 as opposed to say shingles or HSV-1?

What herpes testing, meaning for IgG antibodies, can you confirm that you and your wife had in the past? These must be test results on paper that you have or can get from your doctors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dusty321

So a conversation brought out some truth this evening.  My wife said that She had been diagnosed for HSV2 17 years ago, and having not seen recurrent issues, had neglected to say anything when we met.

It makes some kind of sense of it all.  She also admitted She lied when I asked if She had had symptoms before, including in the time we have been together.

I still find it weird that I have an outbreak now, 1 week after being intimate for the first time in a long time.  Surely I would have it by default after years of being together?

I guess I now just relax into the pain and doubt that this new light throws on things.  I believe her that She has not cheated, but feel a whole load of doubt seeing it all from this vantage point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

It does all make sense regarding your wife.

Note that it is not at all a 100% chance you have HSV-2. About half of all couples in your position will not transfer the virus in a lifetime together.

I’m not sure your position is fully clear. Many oral issues have caused other than herpes, such as staph.

Even If herpes, then the most rational explanation is that you have an oral HSV-1 infection.

With couples, outbreaks at similar times are not too coincidental. Often you are both under similar stresses, exposure to the environment, diet etc. such that if the conditions are enough for an outbreak for one person, they’d be enough for the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JHenry

One thing I would like to add:  When I was diagnosed yearssss ago, my primary care physician promised me that is would be absolutely impossible for me to transfer the virus without an active outbreak present.  

He went on to explain he had oral HSV1 and has yet to transfer the virus of 25 years as proof of his promise  

Obviously, much has been learned since that time.  Perhaps she had been told the same and with few recurrences believed her status was a moot point?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,296
    • Total Posts
      466,186
  • Posts

    • MikeHerp
      Hmm, ok , So  there's a copper ribbon.  I didn't know that. Wonder whether people are aware of that.  
    • MikeHerp
      The prophylactic vaccine trial by GSK took 8 years and they were still not done with it.  That's because it takes time to see whether it works--it's a matter of many people having sex over time and that just takes a lot of time.   A shedding study is quicker, so therapeutic vaccines are quicker to test.  5-6 years I think.  Note that there was a study conducted last year that showed that there's a high correlation between shedding and outbreaks, suggesting that it might not even be necessary to track outbreaks, measuring shedding may be enough. It's unclear what they would be proving in case of a gene editing technique.  I think shedding would be a part of it.  But what else, if anything, I don't know. Anyway, it doesn't necessarily have to take a long time like the GSK prophylactic trials.  
    • Miss Horne
      Role play? Dressing up in the bedroom?
    • Voyager2
      I certainly hope this research continues. It all seems legit to me, but again, I'm no medical man (although I did play doctor a few times).   
    • here-to-help
      This is good information to know. To go from continuous outbreaks to none all this time is encouraging. I wonder if after you've given it some time and this regimen proves itself, maybe you could title it, and type it for everyone to read. The more suggestions, the better! You mentioned you've suffered with Herpes I outbreaks. I have suffered with the type II, and I recently read that Lysine doesn't help with the type II. I don't know about that, because it really has helped me in years past. Anyway, by mentioning in your article that you have type I will help, because apparently something might work for type I that won't work for type II. I myself will get these products and add them to my daily garlic regimen, and perhaps I will be able to eat whatever I choose without triggering an outbreak. That's my big problem, wanting to eat the foods that trigger the outbreak!
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.