Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
LeftCoast

CRISPR breakthrough: gene edited babies HIV

Recommended Posts

raka

can we try crispr on ourself?

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/dec/24/josiah-zayner-diy-gene-editing-therapy-crispr-interview

i read this article. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KG303
4 hours ago, raka said:

Hi, they didn't mention anything about HSV in the article?

No they didn’t, but crispr for sure has the ability to at LEAST give us a functional cure so this is great news. Could be a whole game changer to get the trials started faster and this is a great step. I still feel like it may need more work when it comes to HSV, cause from what I’ve heard crispr can’t touch the latent virus yet. But this is still such a big step! Shows us that it is may be possible soon. Now hopefully the ones who are researching the cure for HSV using crispr are gonna step their game up and also hoping that they deem it to be 100% safe. Fingers crossed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
readytostart

I was thinking about Aaron TRaywick and the herpes vaccine he self administered...the people who crated the vaccine, for what I´ve read, don´t have medical background. After reading this news about china, it seems people are talking about ethical issues, but not legal issues...then, what about the traywick vaccine? did it work? side effects? and if it did work, would for ascendance be ilegal to sell it? I read they planned to do trials in mexico, but I suppose its not the classical Phase 1-2-3 trial...are theygoing ahead with their plans ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LeftCoast

It sounds like what has happened in China is an ethical shit show. News outlets all over the world are reporting today. 

I’m gonna hold out for excision to do their trials. 2021 seems far away but it appears to be the better shot. 

Just super curious what’s gonna happen with these crispr babies now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
readytostart

well I hope it isn´t so, but I feel this china babies yhing is not going to benefit us hsv sufferers...as seen before, it just takes a step in the wrong direction to slow things up, and this is taking too long by now.

It´s about time to have a significant change in the way of managing this virus..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LeftCoast
2 hours ago, readytostart said:

well I hope it isn´t so, but I feel this china babies yhing is not going to benefit us hsv sufferers...as seen before, it just takes a step in the wrong direction to slow things up, and this is taking too long by now.

It´s about time to have a significant change in the way of managing this virus..

Hmmmm, who knows. The CRISPR stock shot up yesterday. 

Maybe more people want to make investments in the technology...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jimmyjimmyhuapua
17 hours ago, readytostart said:

I was thinking about Aaron TRaywick and the herpes vaccine he self administered...the people who crated the vaccine, for what I´ve read, don´t have medical background. After reading this news about china, it seems people are talking about ethical issues, but not legal issues...then, what about the traywick vaccine? did it work? side effects? and if it did work, would for ascendance be ilegal to sell it? I read they planned to do trials in mexico, but I suppose its not the classical Phase 1-2-3 trial...are theygoing ahead with their plans ??

As you know vaccine was tested on Aaron and he died before he announce the results. Maybe it became succesfull none of us will know it. But there is a realtiy crispr is really something working

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
raka

i am looking through the internet why everyone on the internet criticizing him- He Jiankui. he took a step no one is willing to take? there are many people dying out there without a cure. ofcourse there is a risk. there is a risk everywhere. even for the small surgeries doctors make us to sign the papers before they are not responsible if anything happens. 

i encourage people like He Jiankui, if the people are willing to take the risk then why there should be a restriction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cas9
41 minutes ago, raka said:

i am looking through the internet why everyone on the internet criticizing him- He Jiankui. he took a step no one is willing to take? there are many people dying out there without a cure. ofcourse there is a risk. there is a risk everywhere. even for the small surgeries doctors make us to sign the papers before they are not responsible if anything happens. 

i encourage people like He Jiankui, if the people are willing to take the risk then why there should be a restriction

And who do you think is the subject of the risk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
readytostart

I don´t know what all this is going to mean, but I hope two things: I hope this doesn´t affect the actual research by being stopped or putting barriers to research, and I also hope this encourages alternative researchers to move on since apparently there is no legal issue with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
readytostart

It seems that there´s going to be an investigation and consequences to the scientific who did the experiment, also probably a harder regulation in the research, so...not good news, evem if the experiment is succesful. That´s sad, since China was ahead on crispr research.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MikeHerp

It’s encouraging that crispr can handle hsv. But so far, it hasn’t proven it can touch latent virus. So it’s unclear whether it is a viable solution, since it’s unlikely that FDA would allow crispr be introduced permanently expressing cas9 and editing continuously to stop replication. It’s unclear whether having crispr be used one time is safe, let alone permanently editing in our bodies. Because of that, I don’t think excisionbio’s proposed solution, wpild be viable without further tweaks or increases in crispr safety etc.

Still, it’s good that researchers have another tool to play with in relation to HSV. This tool didn’t exist until recently.   In that sense, there is progress. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Atrapasueños

No tiene nada que ver un embrión con un cuerpo ya desarrollado, aparte  lo que hizo el científico chino es anti ético pero en realidad no veo que alguien esté buscando una solución para el hsv sean realistas todos los científicos tienen otras prioridades 

_______________________

It has nothing to do with an embryo and an already developed body, apart from what the Chinese scientist did is unethical but I do not really see that someone is looking for a solution for the hsv be realistic all scientists have other priorities

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RNY18

Latest CRISPR news :

https://www.genomeweb.com/gene-silencinggene-editing/crispr-researchers-engineer-cas12b-ortholog-human-genome-editing

Researchers led by the Broad Institute's Feng Zhang have engineered an ortholog of the CRISPR nuclease Cas12b, making its genome editing activity in human cell lines and ex vivo in primary human T cells more robust.”...

 

Can anyone interpret what this means ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cas9
32 minutes ago, RNY18 said:

Latest CRISPR news :

https://www.genomeweb.com/gene-silencinggene-editing/crispr-researchers-engineer-cas12b-ortholog-human-genome-editing

Researchers led by the Broad Institute's Feng Zhang have engineered an ortholog of the CRISPR nuclease Cas12b, making its genome editing activity in human cell lines and ex vivo in primary human T cells more robust.”...

 

Can anyone interpret what this means ?

 

Edited by Cas9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Evaluate
4 hours ago, RNY18 said:

https://www.france24.com/en/20190122-chinas-second-gene-edited-foetus-12-14-weeks-old-scientist

World's first gene edited babies...

And yet, no one has beaten the HSV ???

We do not know enough about the Chinese study to say whether anything was successful.  Nothing was third-party supervised/verified and the entire study was condemned internationally.  While I think gene-editing is promising and ground breaking, this is not a researcher who has done anything except set every ethical review board on high alert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Evaluate
7 hours ago, RNY18 said:

Latest CRISPR news :

https://www.genomeweb.com/gene-silencinggene-editing/crispr-researchers-engineer-cas12b-ortholog-human-genome-editing

Researchers led by the Broad Institute's Feng Zhang have engineered an ortholog of the CRISPR nuclease Cas12b, making its genome editing activity in human cell lines and ex vivo in primary human T cells more robust.”...

 

Can anyone interpret what this means ?

Translation: we made yet another improvement to gene editing technology (cas) that is not yet tested in anything outside a petri dish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RNY18

Latest CRISPR news :

https://www.genomeweb.com/gene-silencinggene-editing/horizon-discovery-rutgers-collaborate-commercialize-crispr-base-editing#.XE9Ivi2ZPOQ

"Base editing is potentially transformative for all gene editing technologies with the potential to help target many diseases that to date have no treatment. As a world leader in the field of gene editing and gene modulation, both in research and applied markets, we are very excited to partner with Dr. Jin and Rutgers University," Horizon CEO Terry Pizzie said in a statement..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
f*ckedOver
10 hours ago, RNY18 said:

Latest CRISPR news :

https://www.genomeweb.com/gene-silencinggene-editing/horizon-discovery-rutgers-collaborate-commercialize-crispr-base-editing#.XE9Ivi2ZPOQ

"Base editing is potentially transformative for all gene editing technologies with the potential to help target many diseases that to date have no treatment. As a world leader in the field of gene editing and gene modulation, both in research and applied markets, we are very excited to partner with Dr. Jin and Rutgers University," Horizon CEO Terry Pizzie said in a statement..."

Does anyone have access to the full article, it won't let me read it without an account???

Edited by f*ckedOver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RNY18

NEW YORK (GenomeWeb) – Gene editing firm Horizon Discovery and Rutgers University announced today that they have signed a partnership deal to commercialize a gene editing technology developed in the lab of Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School pharmacology associate professor Shengkan Jin.

The base editing platform — which modifies genes by creating single point mutations in DNA without making double-stranded breaks — has potential applications in the development of new cell therapies and will augment Horizon's research tools and services, the company said.

Horizon plans to collaborate with Rutgers to further develop the technology, and work toward commercializing it. As part of the agreement, Horizon has made a non-material payment to Rutgers for an option to exclusively license the base editing technology for use in all therapeutic applications. Horizon's own researchers will also conduct evaluation and proof of concept studies while the firm funds further research in base editing at Rutgers.

"Base editing is potentially transformative for all gene editing technologies with the potential to help target many diseases that to date have no treatment. As a world leader in the field of gene editing and gene modulation, both in research and applied markets, we are very excited to partner with Dr. Jin and Rutgers University," Horizon CEO Terry Pizzie said in a statement.

"By extending our scientific and IP capabilities, Horizon will now be able to more fully support our pharma, biotech, and academic partners to deliver better cell therapy solutions to patients," Pizzie added. "As part of our five-year investment strategy, Horizon committed to investing in high-value technologies that maintain our market leadership; base editing technology is a perfect example of that."

Jin also noted that the cytidine deaminase version of the technology could be useful in creating ex vivo therapeutics for sickle cell anemia and beta thalassemia, HIV-resistant cells, and CAR-T cells for leukemia, as well as in vivo therapeutics for inherited genetic diseases..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      69,563
    • Total Posts
      468,604
  • Posts

    • viralfrog
      I would not be the first one, plenty of others here on the forum who get recurrent OBs despite heavy doses of antivirals. The blisters appear exactly in/around the spot where I had my first OB 4 years ago, plus all the symptoms I have are those commonly described as HSV-2 symptoms. In my opinion, it's a clear case.  But your suggestion is definitely an option that should not be ruled out. I'll wait until I get a bad enough OB again so I can go get another swab test. The outbreak needs to be bad enough to be able to break the blisters to get the liquid from inside right? I recall hearing something like this when I got tested years ago. The doctor used a swab that had tiny needles on it that would pop the blisters open. Do you know if this is right, i.e. you will not get a positive swab just from a mild OB / redness? 
    • jreemi
      90% elimination of the latent virus in thr ganglia probably will be a functional cure. Sure the small remaining amount can reactivate, but thete is a viral load threshhold for transmission. More than likely that won't be enough to cause transmission, or enough shedding for transmission. Damage enough of the latent virus and we are good to go. There is already a Crispr trial on humans going on right now https://newatlas.com/crispr-trial-underway-vertex-gene-therapy/58643/ So we are just waiting on Keith Jerome's lab and Excision Biotherapeutics to begin their trials. I've beem following Crispr for years now, and it keeps gettimg more accurate. I believe researchers at Duke have recently made a big breakthrough on accuracy, by changing the level of regulation instead of cutting DNA. I wonder if these labs collaborate with others such as Jerome's?
    • WilsoInAus
      No need to be tired at all, I'm sorry of you cannot accept the facts surrounding testing, but here they are. Your note is full of inaccuracies so let's iron those out. I don't need you to believe anything, I am just putting the facts out there. Here's a few studies: https://jcm.asm.org/content/37/5/1632 Here we have 29 patients with recent HSV-2 infection... 100% turned positive, 0% false negatives. https://jcm.asm.org/content/36/3/845/figures-only Here we have over 1,000 positive samples from people who have swabbed positive and compared to three different blood tests - over 95% accurate. https://jcm.asm.org/content/26/4/662?ijkey=9ebe349f98ed94f019ed788604c8fa19864a2c7e&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha Here we have 76 people who swabbed positive, the Westernblot detected 99% and an immunoblot 96%. Can you elaborate what is vague about these items of research. I'm sure now you'll want to review the references to these papers where you'll find even more. Some of them are in easy text for the beginner. So you stand corrected, it is in fact your comments that are spreading misinformation. That is not tolerated on this website. Also what nonsense that people do not get lesions to swab upon infection? Where did you read that? Hello Dolly? I'm afraid it is back to the books for you to do some more research before having such a rambunctious spew like above. STOP IT - we are all tired of your unsubstantiated drivel. This is 2019 we want something tangible, something real, something sound and wholesome and not drooling rants equal of the park bench antics of the drunks at 2am Sunday morning! I will NEVER stop because no matter how immature, how bombastic, how fantastic, how inaccurate, how frivolous, how false the spew that ends up on this website - the TRUTH will always be the light, the love, the guidance, the deliverance and the justice... no matter how many capitalised swear words are thrown!
    • Talx2520
      I took an IgG blood test 6 months after the episode. HSV-2 was negative (less than .91) and HSV-1 was high at 3.18
    • RainyDay2
      My comment was about THE BLOOD TEST!  You’re 95-100% accuracy for it?  Garbage.  Pure garbage.  You might as well have pulled that number out of your ass. Google search HIV accuracy... almost every medical site will tell you 4th generation HIV testing is as close to 99.9% percent you can possibly get after a certain period of elapsed time.  They will pretty much GUARANTEE you that you are indeed negative if you have a negative test. That defined certainty of accuracy WILL NOT AND CAN NOT be found for HSV blood tests.  You get vague descriptions of it’s accuracy from almost every site you visit.  NO CERTAINTIES.  Thousands of us on these forums KNOW the test isn’t accurate. When your score is between 1.1 and 3.5, this could be a false positive.  Certain sites list almost 1 in 2 tests can be false positives.  50 fucking percent!! And you want me to believe the test is 95-100% accurate? How come so many sites also seem to dance around the possibility of false negatives?   All that isn’t necessary in HIV testing.  Because if YOU DO get a low positive, the confirmatory HIV test checks for the actual VIRUS in your system.   And there are almost NO FALSE NEGATIVES.    NO HSV BLOOD TEST CAN DO THAT! Not even the Western Blot.  At the end of the day, it’s just a more detailed look at antibodies.  And many sites will tell you a “small” number of people may never develop. How small are we talking???? That can be any number.   Trash. And again, a large margin of people with herpes DO NOT GET LESIONS to be swabbed.  Google tells you that.  If majority of herpes infected have nothing to swab,  well that pretty much makes PCRs and cultures worthless for the most part doesn’t it?  If there is nothing to swab after a year, in your words, you are clear of herpes. BULLSHIT! So Wilso, just stop it.  You have never done scientific testing in a lab yourself on herpes. You are not a doctor.  You are constantly telling people false information.  Assuring them of promises you have no authority to make.  I’ve seen you do it time and time again.  Do you have regrets???????????  Im tired of your lies.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.