Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  
Imshook

Tested for the second time 6 days after original igg test and i ordered a western blot today as well.

Recommended Posts

Imshook

Hello.

 

im not see if u are familiar with my past posts but i was diagnosed with hsv 2 with the igg test and it came back positive with a value of 1.14 . The Normal range is 0.00-0.91 but i see some say 1.1 . Any who i originally tested at a urgent care and i went to my pcp to get a second opinion . He says that if it says positive it’s positive . But he retested me (waiting for results) i also thought the western blot test was a scam but i guess it’s not and i ordered one today. If my second IGH test comes back positive i will probably just take that answer . If it comes back funky or negative i will send off the western blot.  This experience has taught me a lot about myself in less than a week. It also shows that the lack of knowledge in doctors is crazy (my pcp even said he don’t usually test for it and that the test aren’t accurate but still said if it’s positive it’s positive) . Whether my test comes back positive or not . My heart goes out to everyone who is effected by this virus or who is unsure and have to adjust to this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

Hey @Imshook are are you negative for HSV-1?

Given you have taken the IgG so soon after the last one, there’s a reasonable chance it will be low positive and still not be conclusive at all.

The Westernblot is far from a scam, it’s the best blood test for herpes there is and extremely accurate, 99.9%+ for HSV-2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
1 minute ago, WilsoInAus said:

Hey @Imshook are are you negative for HSV-1?

Given you have taken the IgG so soon after the last one, there’s a reasonable chance it will be low positive and still not be conclusive at all.

The Westernblot is far from a scam, it’s the best blood test for herpes there is and extremely accurate, 99.9%+ for HSV-2.

Yes i am negative for hsv 1. My doctor said it wouldn’t matter in the time length that’s why i tested again .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus
1 minute ago, Imshook said:

Yes i am negative for hsv 1. My doctor said it wouldn’t matter in the time length that’s why i tested again .

I’m sorry doc is wrong for IgG testing, some people are even permanently low positive but do not carry the virus.

However the WB will sort it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
11 minutes ago, WilsoInAus said:

I’m sorry doc is wrong for IgG testing, some people are even permanently low positive but do not carry the virus.

However the WB will sort it out.

You seem very sure , but i guess we will see. Is there proof of this on the forum that you can refer me to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tone123

It definetly isn't a scam it's the most accurate test you can get, as long as you've waited atleast 12 weeks post any concerning encounter. I did it at 34 weeks with negative results for hsv2. I recently called the u o w and spoke with them ( very nice people) about this subject. She reassured me that I'm negative and I don't have to do it again because I was wanting to do it again. She said in her 25 years there she never seen someone test positive on the wb beyond 5 months. 5 months was the longest and the person has hiv. The best advice I can give u is to not read as much as I did and go with the blot as your final answer. As for references go to Westover heights forum and type in anything you wish and it'll answer your questions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
25 minutes ago, Tone123 said:

It definetly isn't a scam it's the most accurate test you can get, as long as you've waited atleast 12 weeks post any concerning encounter. I did it at 34 weeks with negative results for hsv2. I recently called the u o w and spoke with them ( very nice people) about this subject. She reassured me that I'm negative and I don't have to do it again because I was wanting to do it again. She said in her 25 years there she never seen someone test positive on the wb beyond 5 months. 5 months was the longest and the person has hiv. The best advice I can give u is to not read as much as I did and go with the blot as your final answer. As for references go to Westover heights forum and type in anything you wish and it'll answer your questions. 

Thank you . I will take your advice i ordered it . Now i have to find somewhere to draw my blood to send off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tone123
10 minutes ago, Imshook said:

Thank you . I will take your advice i ordered it . Now i have to find somewhere to draw my blood to send off

Look for a place called anylabtest they do it unless you can have a Dr sign off for it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
40 minutes ago, Tone123 said:

Look for a place called anylabtest they do it unless you can have a Dr sign off for it. 

Thank you there is one 45 mins away .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
23 hours ago, Tone123 said:

Look for a place called anylabtest they do it unless you can have a Dr sign off for it. 

 

23 hours ago, Tone123 said:

Look for a place called anylabtest they do it unless you can have a Dr sign off for it. 

What about the supplemental results being positive . Isn’t that close to the WB ? Mine was positive with my low index value of 1.14 . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus

Hey @Imshook I am not sure what you mean by a supplemental?

A low positive does not confirm an infection regardless of how many in a row a person may test so. Most people with the virus test over 5! If Focus Diagnostics had their time again, they’d probably have filed a different control level with the FDA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
1 hour ago, WilsoInAus said:

Hey @Imshook I am not sure what you mean by a supplemental?

A low positive does not confirm an infection regardless of how many in a row a person may test so. Most people with the virus test over 5! If Focus Diagnostics had their time again, they’d probably have filed a different control level with the FDA.

A supplemental test is another test that’s given when it’s a low positive .  The cdc guideline says it’s implemented if it’s a low positive . If that test comes back positive then it’s positive. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus
1 hour ago, Imshook said:

A supplemental test is another test that’s given when it’s a low positive .  The cdc guideline says it’s implemented if it’s a low positive . If that test comes back positive then it’s positive. 

Yes there is a thing known as a reflex test - this is not a second IgG test. It would be annotated as such. Still doesn’t carry as much weight as the WB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Samantha1997
On 9/9/2019 at 3:15 PM, WilsoInAus said:

I’m sorry doc is wrong for IgG testing, some people are even permanently low positive but do not carry the virus.

However the WB will sort it out.

So ifpeople gets low positive maybe they even not have the virus? 5 is low positive right? There are people with 50

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus
2 hours ago, Samantha1997 said:

So ifpeople gets low positive maybe they even not have the virus? 5 is low positive right? There are people with 50

Yes you are correct, most people with the virus test over 5. Especially the range from 1.1 to 3.5 has many false positives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Samantha1997
37 minutes ago, WilsoInAus said:

Yes you are correct, most people with the virus test over 5. Especially the range from 1.1 to 3.5 has many false positives.

With or without the virus? U confused me. If i tested 5 it is a really low positive so maybe is false positive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
On 9/18/2019 at 4:34 PM, Samantha1997 said:

With or without the virus? U confused me. If i tested 5 it is a really low positive so maybe is false positive?

 

On 9/10/2019 at 8:44 PM, WilsoInAus said:

Yes there is a thing known as a reflex test - this is not a second IgG test. It would be annotated as such. Still doesn’t carry as much weight as the WB.

If my supplemental test is positive I’m going to accept that. Continuing testing isn’t helping my mental state . This experience is traumatic. The western heights forum is saying supplemental testing is accurate .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WilsoInAus
1 hour ago, Imshook said:

 

If my supplemental test is positive I’m going to accept that. Continuing testing isn’t helping my mental state . This experience is traumatic. The western heights forum is saying supplemental testing is accurate .

You are not having a supplemental test, you must ask your doctor to ensure that the lab performs a 'reflex' test on your IgG if it is low positive. A reflect or supplementary test is not simply another IgG test.

Did you get the Westernblot results yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Imshook
6 minutes ago, WilsoInAus said:

You are not having a supplemental test, you must ask your doctor to ensure that the lab performs a 'reflex' test on your IgG if it is low positive. A reflect or supplementary test is not simply another IgG test.

Did you get the Westernblot results yet?

The reflex was done sir that’s the supplemental test . Yes i have the package for western blot . I’m debating on what should be done

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Donate

    If Honeycomb has helped you, please help us by making a donation so we can provide you with even better features and services.

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      71,016
    • Total Posts
      480,286
  • 0_unsure-if-it-is-herpes.png

    Nervous about dating with herpes? Skip "the talk" and browse profiles here.

  • Posts

    • hk81
      It was not the main point of the discussion. Did I write that I believe in such an approach? I only referred to it because I wanted to point out that researchers have always been looking at the condition called latency, trying to demystify it.
    • avr
      I'm not the one who claimed that he said that, and I don't have time now to read the literature to try and find it. Bob made the claim so if anything then he should be the one to back it up. I am not doubting that the fasting mimicking diet works to get autophagy going. It's a vegetable soup with some fat, so it makes sense that it would - glucose and protein inhibit autophagy, so just leave them both out and run on fat and micronutrients for a while. It's actually a kind of ketogenic diet, just without protein. Yet at the same time as promoting this specific type of keto diet, he trashes the standard keto diet with arguments that make no sense to me. That's why he seems suspect to me, because it looks like he is trying to tell people that his own expensive product is the only way to get the coveted autophagy, that you can't get it yourself simply through doing keto and/or intermittent fasting. And his product is quite overpriced for a simple vegetable soup, which is all it really is. I can make that myself. Or just boil some veggies and add some butter or a creamy sauce, I used to eat such meals quite often actually before I went carnivore. I must have been getting lots of autophagy then without even realising it. Yes, it might be that he is right about the onset of autophagy, or half-right if it depends on how keto-adapted you are. But since he has a vested interest, his word should not count as evidence for us. I don't think that's being unfair to him. If Bob wants us to believe it, he needs to provide evidence from a neutral source. @Bob8857 Do you have any better evidence?
    • The Hammer
      Not sure wth this is but I'm thinking the worst!! Been with 2 woman for the past 14 yrs and this popped up after I trimmed and shaved. Never had anything like this pop up b4
    • Muscha
      Please. Go ahead for transparency sake...let him.know you tested negative on a western blot and every other test before you tell him you have hsv. Because we all know it's coming.  Feel the Blurne!!!
    • WilsoInAus
      Post flagged for moderation. You have once again hijacked the thread to self serve your own delusion, You’ve been warned multiple times by several moderators and on your last warning. Your diagnosis was not confirmed but hypothesised on the basis of a now false positive IgG test. The WB failed to confirm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.