Jump to content

Marugo - Amenalief


MikeHerp

Recommended Posts


This was already posted earlier.

But I just wanted to emphasize, this is pretty good news. 

https://www.maruho.co.jp/english/release/nek5p400000055oj-att/20190909_pr_eng.pdf

Hopefully this will be a continuation of the work they previously undertook.  So a path to regulatory approval, would be shortened.

This would also hopefully mean, cheaper meds.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the very least it looks like we may all have some new treatment options within a couple years...that would be life changing for many of us...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This for sure is great news, I hope due to this that the prices will drop. Since I am planning to start using it in the near future.

I also hope that any of the meds will be available in the EU anytime soon when it is approved by the FDA.

Does anyone know if a FDA approval is also counting for the West-EU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mikeike3 said:

price has dropped - 475-510 shipped

It looks like the same price as around a year ago.  

Edited by MikeHerp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Kurdt01 said:

Any educated guess what the timeline might be for this to be available in the US? I keep waiting on the price to drop from the Japanese site...

I'm not sure.  I had a feeling that it had been in the process of a phase 2 in the US.  But hopefully somebody can check whether that is actually the case.  I don't remember whether the phase 2 was finished or not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MikeHerp said:

I'm not sure.  I had a feeling that it had been in the process of a phase 2 in the US.  But hopefully somebody can check whether that is actually the case.  I don't remember whether the phase 2 was finished or not.  

No, phase 2 was not successfully navigated.

An IND application needs to be made before the clinical trials commence. The Pre-IND meeting doesn’t mean the trials have been approved, it’s just a chance to receive feedback from the FDA regarding the drug and the plans for the trials.

Next step is for submission of the IND.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MikeHerp said:

Trials were previously approved and phase 2 was completed in the US.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00486200

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22351940

https://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs/800025919

Alternative Names: Amenalief; ASP-2151; M-5220

That’s the Atellas trials not related this company’s application.

Astellas is a whole other story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a drug that was licensed by Astellas to Maruho.  Of course, Maruho can piggyback on previous trial results by Astellas in the US.  It's the same drug dude.  

That's why they are talking about phase 3 now, not phase 1.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MikeHerp said:

This is a drug that was licensed by Astellas to Maruho.  Of course, Maruho can piggyback on previous trial results by Astellas in the US.  It's the same drug dude.  

That's why they are talking about phase 3 now, not phase 1.

 

 

I’m not sure about that, Astellas has been suspended.

Either way, a Phase 2 has to be completed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WilsoInAus said:

I’m not sure about that, Astellas has been suspended.

Either way, a Phase 2 has to be completed.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00486200

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22351940

Condition or disease  Intervention/treatment  Phase 
Herpes Genitalis Drug: ASP2151Drug: valacyclovirDrug: Placebo Phase 2

Actual Enrollment  :

695 participants

Actual Study Start Date  : June 21, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date  : August 12, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date  : August 12, 2008

RESULTS:

Of 695 adults enrolled, 437 experienced a recurrence and received study drug. Median time for lesion healing excluding aborted lesions was 139.8 hours with placebo, 119.6 hours with ASP2151 (100 mg; hazard ratio


, 1.40; P = .065), 106.2 with ASP2151 (200 mg; HR, 1.40; P = .081), 115.9 with ASP2151 (400 mg; HR, 1.25; P = .25), 102.1 with ASP2151 (1200 mg; HR, 1.72; P = .007), and 113.9 with valacyclovir (500 mg twice daily; HR, 1.42; P = .077), indicating improvement in all treatment groups except ASP2151 (400 mg). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Three-day or single-day courses of ASP2151 appear to be effective and safe options for treatment of episodes of recurrent genital herpes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@MikeHerp way off piste, lets get back to the comments I have made.

In the eyes of the FDA, a phase 2 trial has to be completed. It’s in the press release.

The drug had previously failed safety in Phase 3 which I suspect invalidates the previous Phase 2 trials. Clearly doing the phase 2 trial again is intended to allay the safety concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A phase 2 has already been completed dude.  

I've linked to it 3 times in this thread already lol.  All you have to do is point your cursor over this link, and then click your mouse button.  

Do you have a mouse in your computer?  Does the mouse button work?  

The phase 2 in the press release is an "exploratory study".  It's probably for a different indication.  Maybe for suppression.  Who knows.  The bottom line is that, a phase 2 was completed, and the results were published already.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, MikeHerp said:

A phase 2 has already been completed dude.  

I've linked to it 3 times in this thread already lol.  All you have to do is point your cursor over this link, and then click your mouse button.  

Do you have a mouse in your computer?  Does the mouse button work?  

The phase 2 in the press release is an "exploratory study".  It's probably for a different indication.  Maybe for suppression.  Who knows.  The bottom line is that, a phase 2 was completed, and the results were published already.

 

 

 

No one’s denying that. The failure of the phase 3 study probably requires the phase 2 study.

They are doing a phase 2 study, simplex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh?  lol.  

Again, phase 2 was already completed.  So it's not required.  It's been done.  

"CONCLUSIONS:  Three-day or single-day courses of ASP2151 appear to be effective and safe options for treatment of episodes of recurrent genital herpes."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MikeHerp said:

Huh?  lol.  

Again, phase 2 was already completed.  So it's not required.  It's been done.  

"CONCLUSIONS:  Three-day or single-day courses of ASP2151 appear to be effective and safe options for treatment of episodes of recurrent genital herpes."

 

And subsequent to that they failed a Phase 3 on the basis of safety. Back to phase 2 to move forward safely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're just making shi* up again.  

Phase 2 was already completed.  Phase 2 already showed safety.  So showing safety through phase 2, would be redundant.

FDA has already approved the plan for phase 3, which would be difficult if there was no completed phase 2.  Phase 2 data is critical to approving the plan for a phase 3 trial.  

It's clear you had no knowledge about this drug or the licensing to Maruho, or that it was already tested in the US. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MikeHerp said:

You're just making shi* up again.  

Phase 2 was already completed.  Phase 2 already showed safety.  So showing safety through phase 2, would be redundant.

FDA has already approved the plan for phase 3, which would be difficult if there was no completed phase 2.  Phase 2 data is critical to approving the plan for a phase 3 trial.  

It's clear you had no knowledge about this drug or the licensing to Maruho, or that it was already tested in the US. 

 

The FDA have not approved anything, where does the press release say approved?

A pre-IND meeting is to gain feedback only, it is not part of the approval process, nor compulsory.

I feel the press release is clear enough, but lets wait to see the trials filed as part of the actual IND shall we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MikeHerp said:

It says the plan for phase 3 was accepted by the FDA.  

Exactly what I said.

the “development plan” for phase 2 and phase 3 was “accepted”.

There is no approval element to a pre-IND meeting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Donate

    If Honeycomb has helped you, please help us by making a donation so we can provide you with even better features and services.

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
      71.9k
    • Total Posts
      485.2k
  • Posts

    • Nameshame
      @WilsoInAus do you really thing that above my symptoms are Herpes related? Or it may because of Herpes zoster shingles? Bcz of this my Igm is positive?
    • Nameshame
      @WilsoInAus i requested my partner, but they are refusing from testing and saying they dint had any symptoms. Now the only way i left is to wait untill 12 weeks window period right? I am not getting what to do in this case. Any suggestion for any other tests?
    • CHT
      Hi "Jeremy"..... I agree, the topic of your HSV status does not need to be something you disclose too soon in a developing relationship..... get to know each other first....see how it's going and as it progresses, then the HSV issue will naturally need to be revealed.... it's my personal opinion though that before there is any sexual encounter you ought to disclose your HSV status.... I know some will disagree with me on this but, I think it is morally wrong not to disclose first.  This can be a make/break situation for most people but, again, I feel it is simply wrong not to give the other person the whole story since your decision not to disclose could put their health at risk.... that is simply not an option in my opinion.  Looking back to my "pre-HSV" life I most certainly would want my partner to disclose their HSV+ status before intimacy so that I could make my decision as to whether I want to take that risk or not.... 
    • Jeremy Spokein
      Thanks, CHT. I appreciate the feedback. The whole trauma of going through this has led me to figure out a lot about myself and my attachment wounds, so I'm taking courses to come out of this better. This girl really was my dream woman in so many ways, it's been the hardest heartbreak to deal with ever. I'm truly in a lot of pain, but using the pain as fuel to launch that new business and work with coaches. I also opened up to my family about HSV, so my parents and sister know now, and they were very loving and accepting of it. Since opening up about it, I feel way better around this thing. After opening up, I also found out that some mutual friends in our family have discordant couples who are married with children, so HSV hasn't stopped them from living a loving life. The thing is... all of these couples I mention did not disclose until 6-8 months into the relationship. So now I'm thinking it might be better not to disclose until I know things are very serious. I'll of course stay on the medication and use protection, but maybe this is a better route than disclosing upfront and scaring women off.
    • WilsoInAus
      Hey @Lcj987 and welcome to the website. You can be sure that isn't HSV-2, looks nothing like it. It is much more likely to be folliculitis or inflamed fordyce spots.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.