Jump to content
World's Largest Herpes Support Group
Sign in to follow this  

Myth's or not????

Recommended Posts


:cool:Hi.... I'm new here....lol.... can ya tell??? :rolleyes: A little bit about me..... I was diagnosed 5 or 6 years ago after the gamut of STD tests at the ob/gyn. I got the call and went in and talked with the doctor. I never even suspected that I had it so imagine my shock. But I have survived the initial shock and am moving forward in life. Now, on to my question.......

I have been looking for some info online about a couple of things I heard.... with no luck. So....... here I am hoping someone can confirm or deny these for me.

1) If you had chickenpox as a child (or at any point in your life) you are more "immune" to HSV. (all I could find out is that one is herpes simplex and one is herpes varicella (?) but nothing about common antibodies or anything like that)

2) This was posted on another site I stumbled on a couple years ago and was written by a Doctor (allegedly) ....... The chances of contracting HSV-2 orally are very slim because HSV-2 does not "like" the environment of the mouth. If it is contracted orally the outbreaks are not very frequent .

I would be interested to hear if these are in fact true or simply myths.

Thanks for your help !!!!!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If having had chickenpox protected you from herpes, I wouldn't have it now, nor would a lot of other people. When I was a kid (eons ago), when one kid got chickenpox, all the other moms brought their kids over so they would get it, too. (chickenpox parties) The thinking was, better to get it when you're a kid than as an adult, which is true. But herpes simplex and chickenpox are not the same virus, and having antibodies for one will not protect you from the other, unfortunately.

To answer your other question HSV1 prefers the facial area, and HSV2 prefers the genitals, and they don't seem to flourish as well in a reversed location. Outbreaks may be less frequent or severe. At least that's the general opinion, I believe.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Herpes simplex and varicella zoster are different viruses and having antibodies to one doesn't protect from getting another. All herpes viruses share the ability to establish latent infection and persist for life.

And it's true that the cases of oral HSV2 infection are extremely rare.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  


Try a Lysine supplement for cold sores

  • The Hive is Thriving!

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Posts

    • Quest
      When I broke out/ shed it usually was on my backside left side, my  upper crack or back right below the belt! Doggy style is my absolute favorite position which makes him very vulnerable! I think there definitely is an advantage to wearing some sexy clothes or latex! Or even the liquid gloves. I think the biggest problem is that people shave now and they nick and cut themselves! That leads them open for infection on any part of the boxer area!  
    • WilsoInAus
      I’d build on this to say that the volume of virus is critical. It has been observed that shedding instances where there are 10^7 virions are required for a pragmatic chance to actually get through the skin and it’s natural defences. Most shedding instances are well below this threshold. I’d also suggest that for many asymptomatic transmissions, most of the virus comes to the surface during the sexual act itself. So little point testing beforehand.
    • floydmonk
      Thank you for sharing that. Very resourceful.
    • Cas9
      I wasn't following the conversation closely, but yes, all that matters in terms of being contagious is if the virus makes it to the skin.
    • yadayadayadayada
      @Cas9 isn't that a "technicality"? From the sound of it this means that on a cellular level there is a daily battle but at the end of the day the virus can't transmit until it is present on the skin... right? I mean the question will still be: how many days is the virus present and transmittable. The mechanism (the technicality) is important but also not important... but I could be wrong, just trying to interpret. 

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.